Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 33

I want the reader to stop for a moment at this point and think about all of the above. Imagine that there is someone you love, someone who you have said is the "love of your life." Maybe even imagine it is your child if it is easier to get the proper "feeling" that way. Now, imagine that this person has just disappeared. Keep imagining. Imagine that you ARE innocent of any harm to the person. You can even imagine that you are convinced that certain nefarious groups may be "after you" for some reason, so you already have the idea that you could be a target for any number of "arranged problems." Forget any other details about Ira's case, the scream, the horrible smell of rotting flesh, the odd behavior about the trunk and the closet. In your scenario, none of that happened. You are a target of evil organizations and your loved one just disappeared, and you are worried. Really worried. What would you do? What actions would naturally result from such a situation?

If you suspected that you had been targeted by some secret gang, what kinds of actions would you take to discover if harm had come to your loved one? Would you refuse to cooperate with the investigator hired by the family of the one you love? Even if you didn't like the family? In such a situation, even people who don't really like each other generally will unite in the common goal of assuring the well-being of someone they both love. What kind of investigations would you undertake on your own?

I bet you can think of all kinds of things that Ira never did. In fact, there are a number of movies and stories about people in exactly such situations who have made heroic efforts to find a loved one at great risk to their personal safety and reputation. Because of love.

Well, for whatever reason, in spite of the fact of his declared great love for Holly, Ira did nothing. Oh, sure, he claimed he took certain steps, but no one supported his claims. None of the people who he would have been expected to contact to find out Holly's whereabouts were ever asked by him if they had any ideas or had heard anything. And his story about a call from Holly was only used to obfuscate those who suspected foul play. He said he loved her, but his actions did not match his words.

But, getting back to our hypothetical scenario: Imagine that you are just sleeping in your bed after two years of worry and searching for your lost loved one, and the police show up at your door suggesting that the solution to the problem might be in your closet. (Yeah, I know, this is stretching our imagination a bit, but keep trying.) Anybody who really loves somebody, who has really worried about that person, even if they are incredulous at the mere suggestion that their own closet may hold the answer is certainly not going to obfuscate the issue of the keys. You are going to want to know WHY anybody would think that the answer is in the closet. Heck, maybe you haven't looked in the closet for years. And, as Ira claimed, maybe you DO suspect that something might be arranged by shadowy groups to set you up because of your "radical work." Is that going to diminish the feeling you have for your loved one? Is that going to interfere with your desire to leave no stone unturned that may lead to a solution of where the loved one may be found? Of course not.

Okay, next imagine that the trunk has been opened and - to your complete astonishment - a body has been found. A trustworthy individual who would be considered to know what he was saying when he announced that a body has been found, has just told you that a body is there, and that it looks like your beloved one. Keep in mind, the suggestion has been made that this is someone you LOVE with all your heart. Someone that you have been trying desperately to find for almost two years. Keep in mind that you suspect that someone may have been after you, to harm you, and it may be that this harm was done to your loved one in order to get to you. And as much as you don't want to think that your loved one is dead, you HAVE to know! Are you going to stand there and hear a detective say: "we found a body, it may be your loved one" and just answer "You found what you found," ???

And then, even if you are not allowed to rush madly to the closet to SEE with your own eyes, but instead, are arrested for murder, are you going to just say "Yes, I want to remain silent?"

And now that your beloved has at last been found, are you going to immediately grant an interview with a journalist in which you tell the journalist that you KNOW who murdered your loved one, but that you aren't going to say who did it to "set you up." Are you going to follow this with: "I did not kill whoever was supposed to be in there. I do not know if a body got in there - if it was a body."??

Excuuuuse me!

What we are looking at is a classic display of the psychopathic personality. He claimed to "love" Holly, yet in all the material I have reviewed about the case, other than repeating that he "loved Holly," there is not a single expression of grief or anguish. He knew the word love, but clearly did not really know what it meant. Oh, sure, he knew how to "act out" love in ordinary ways, but he had never had anyone to observe who was in the situation he found himself in, so he had no "model" to ape in order to produce the appropriate responses. This is the weakness of the psychopath. All their "emotions" are "acting," and they can only act based on what they learn from others. And even if they have produced, momentarily, an appropriate display, something about the way their mind works makes them unable to sustain it. They are so focused on themselves, that they simply cannot abide attention being diverted to anyone or anything else, and will unconsciously give themselves away.

Oh, indeed, others noted Ira's coldness it and Ira explained it as being his great "control," that he had faced so many difficult situations that he gave himself an "auto-hypnotic suggestion" so he would be calm. But that was only AFTER it was pointed out how odd his behavior appeared to others.

Those who doubted him had their doubts thrown back in their face on the platform of his public persona. The very idea that they would doubt him became an implied moral failing on their part!

"This is a time of testing. I try to learn from every situation. Now I'm going to see if my friends believe in me. I think that they do. I know that many people will help. I know that many will refuse to believe what's being said. These people know me. They'll stand by me. I'm sure of it."

And, of course, with such a challenge thrown out there, they did.

Curiously, Einhorn's choice of legal counsel was Arlen Specter, the strategist who conceived the controversial "single-bullet/lone assassin" theory regarding the death of John F. Kennedy. Einhorn was a very vocal critic of the Warren Report and held the single bullet theory in complete contempt. A mutual friend of Einhorn and Specter suggested Specter as counsel, and Einhorn tossed aside his previous scruples and said "yes!" If Specter could convince the world that a single assassin had murdered JFK, he could convince the world that Holly got into Einhorn's closet along with all her things, completely unbeknownst to Ira.

The first objective was to secure a low bail. Bail hearings are held to determine whether or not the suspect should be considered reliable enough to be released on bail until tried. Witnesses are brought in who will attest to the fact that the accused is of such good character that they will abide by the law and show up for their trial.

The first character witness for Ira Einhorn was Stephen J. Harmelin, an attorney with a prestigious law firm. He had known Ira since high school, and he described his character and reputation as "excellent."

The assistant district attorney, Joseph Murray hoped to uncover indications that Einhorn might leave the country rather than face a trial. His first concern regarding this was Einhorn's income. There had been years of speculation about just how Einhorn DID make his money, even though it was obvious that he lived very frugally and didn't need much. He did, however, travel a great deal and engaged in activities that might be thought to require goodly sums from time to time. Where was it coming from?

"What does he do for a living?" Murray asked.

His long time friend from high school wasn't precisely sure.

"My understanding is that he acts as a consultant for various institutions in Philadelphia."

"Like what?"

"My recollection is that he was doing some consulting work for the Bell Telephone Company. Mr. Einhorn seemed to be able to bring to the attention of corporate executives a kind of broad spectrum of information which they otherwise wouldn't generally have available to them."

"Like what?"

Edward Mahler, a vice-president of personnel relations at Bell, was called upon to explain the relationship:

"We wish to be responsive to the needs of the community. In that context I was introduced by a friend to Ira, and we started our relationship. I became, as it were, the contact with Mr. Einhorn. I think I would dare to say we would meet two to three times a month… We talk fundamentally about things related to the community. I would discuss with him things we were proposing, and he would respond to them. Then we'd talk, of course, about myriad things that had nothing to do with the telephone company."

"And did Mr. Einhorn have contacts with other key executives at Bell Telephone?"

"Yes, he did from time to time."

"Such as?"

"Such as our president and former president."

"How much was he paid as a consultant?"

"Nothing in cash."

"What? In check?"

"No, nothing like that. No money changes hands."

The judge, William M. Marutani, was so curious about this bizarre series of remarks that he proceeded to question the witness himself.

"Do I understand, Mr. Mahler, that you meet Mr. Einhorn say, two or three times a month?"

"Yes."

"And what would these be, you would happen to bump into each other?"

"No, no, no. Excuse me, Your Honor. Ira represented a group in the community that we did not hear from. Where it seemed to us he could represent their point of view. It was not one we could [otherwise] be aware of… And at least that was the reason for maintaining regular contact."

"Was this a public relations venture by Bell Telephone?" the judge asked.

"Oh, okay, community relations, Judge."

"And Bell Telephone, with all its wealth, never gave him a dime?" The judge was obviously incredulous that the phone company even took Ira seriously.

"No sir, no sir. We did do one thing for him. I feel I should mention it to explain in part what went on. It seems that Ira represented the people in the community, like the professor you heard, the lawyer, the physicist, the futurist, and so on. [We] would reproduce articles that Ira would find, or others would find, and mail them to members of the group… It was a service we performed, you could say, for Ira. He was very appreciative of it. But again, it was in line with our communicating with this broader network, Judge.

"What would be in it for people such as Ira to go to all this trouble?"

There was no answer that was obvious. Mahler knew that Ira had never wanted money. It was his declared purpose to just be a "networker." Money did not motivate him. He claimed that he operated on a higher and grander system: he worked without pay for Planet Earth! That's who Ira was.

Mahler was excused.

Continue to page 290

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .