Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 31

If such information has been "allowed" to be leaked suggesting that religion is used by such groups, again using the rules of disinformation, we might think that the issue that is being concealed is that religions are CREATED by hyperdimensional being via Time Travel. And we cannot exclude the human factor as well.

At this point, I want to present a short and selective list of books and papers on Game Theory so that the reader will have some idea of how this theory is being used by reading the titles of the articles. Keep in mind, this is only what is allowed to be published.

1928 John von Neumann: Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele

1930 F. Zeuthen: Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare.

1944 John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior

1950-53 John Nash wrote four papers: Equilibrium Points in N- Person Games (1950) and Non-cooperative Games (1951) The Bargaining Problem (1950) and Two-Person Cooperative Games (1953)

1953 H. W. Kuhn; Extensive Games and the Problem of Information, includes the formulation of extensive form games which allow the modeller to specify the exact order in which players have to make their decisions and to formulate the assumptions about the information possessed by the players in all stages of the game.

1954 L. S. Shapley and M. Shubik: A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System. They use the Shapley value to determine the power of the members of the UN Security Council.

1954-55 Problems of forming and solving military pursuit games. Rand Corporation research memoranda, by Isaacs, RM-1391 (30 November 1954), RM-1399 (30 November 1954), RM-1411 (21 December 1954) and RM-1486 (25 March 1955) all entitled, in part, Differential Games.

1955 R. B. Braithwaite: Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher.

1959 Martin Shubik: Strategy and Market Structure: Competition, Oligopoly, and the Theory of Games .

1960 Thomas C. Schelling's The Strategy of Conflict.

1961 R. C. Lewontin in Evolution and the Theory of Games.

1962 D. Gale and L. Shapley College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage .

1965 Rufus Isaacs: Differential Games: A Mathematical Theory with Applications to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization.

1966 John Harsanyi: A General Theory of Rational Behavior in Game Situations A game is cooperative if commitments--agreements, promises, threats--are fully binding and enforceable. It is non-cooperative if commitments are not enforceable.

1967-68 John Harsanyi: Games with Incomplete Information Played by 'Bayesian' Players, Parts I, II and III This laid the theoretical groundwork for information economics that has become one of the major themes of economics and game theory.

1972 John Maynard Smith: Game Theory and The Evolution of Fighting.

1973 J. Maynard Smith and G. Price: The Logic of Animal Conflict.

1973 Gibbard Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result

1974 R. J. Aumann and L. S. Shapley: Values of Non-Atomic Games. It deals with values for large games in which all the players are individually insignificant (non-atomic games).

1976 Robert Aumann Agreeing to Disagree An event is common knowledge among a set of agents if all know it and all know that they all know it and so on ad infinitum.

1981 R. J. Aumann Survey of Repeated Games This survey firstly proposed the idea of applying the notion of an automaton to describe a player in a repeated game.

1985 J.-F. Mertens and S. Zamir: Formulation of Bayesian Analysis for Games with Incomplete Information, Shows that it is not possible to construct a situation for which there is no sets of types large enough to contain all the private information that players are supposed to have.

1988 Tan and Werlang: The Bayesian Foundations of Solution Concepts of Games formally discusses the assumptions about a player's knowledge that lie behind the concepts of Nash equilibria and rationalizability.

As it happens, the Economist who visited us, and who left with the C's transcripts in hand, was an expert in Bayesian logic.

Strategic behavior arises when two or more individuals interact and each individual's decision turns on what that individual expects the others to do. Incomplete information is the central problem in game theory. Control of what information is available and whether it is or is not utilized amounts to "stacking the cards" in favor of the one in control of the information. People make choices based on "payoffs." They are "rational" in the sense that they consistently prefer outcomes with higher payoffs to those with lower payoffs. People make decisions based on their beliefs about what others will do. And when we come to the problem of beliefs, we begin to enter the arena that is controlled by what is known as Bayesian logic. This solution builds on the idea of positing the knowledge and/or beliefs of the various players.

And in Game Theory, the best way to know what knowledge or beliefs the players have or believe is most easily controlled by CREATING the beliefs that assist in the covering up of the information that would assist the player in formulating a winning strategy.

It is as likely that those who are creating the New Age religion or who are running the New Age COINTELPRO operation are part of this Game Strategy of making sure that humanity is limited in terms of information, and are manipulatable in terms of belief. In such a way, the Control System can play their "Dominant Strategy" with assurance that the other players will respond in a very precise way.

Religion is the Devil's greatest achievement. In the guise of religion he has pulled off his most audacious coup. He has flagrantly masqueraded as God. He has had us bow down and worship him. He has had us commit every type of evil in the name of holiness. He has passed off his bigotry as God's opinions. He has had us segregate humanity into the 'ins ' and the 'outs', believers and non-believers, the saved and the damned. He has convinced us that God likes us but not them. And convinced them that God likes them but not us. And then, in a stroke of dark brilliance, he warns his faithful flock of sheep: 'Be sure you do not pay heed to anyone but me, for the Devil is a wily wolf and he will surely trick you.' [Jesus and The Lost Goddess, Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy, 2001 Harmony Books, New York]

World War II was known as the "scientists' war. After the Rockefeller and Bamberger money had set things up to make Princeton the center of the Mathematical universe here on earth, Princeton mathematicians were involved in ciphers and code breaking, the science of ballistics, statistical analysis of enemy positions, and so on. The scientists from Princeton made breakthroughs in radar, infrared detection, bomb delivering airplanes, long-range rocketry, torpedoes, and other instruments of destruction. Mathematicians were needed to evaluate assessment of the effectiveness of weapons, efficient use of weapons, how many tons of explosives were needed to kill the most people, and so on.

And then, of course, there was the A bomb.

At the end of WW II, there was no longer any doubt in the minds of those running the American government that mathematics was the king of sciences. New theories and sophisticated math gave them the needed edge to win the war, and mathematicians partook of the prosperity that followed - mainly those at Princeton. What's more, mathematics was no longer the activity of gentlemen of leisure - it was a wide-open field for anyone with talent. Being Jewish or foreign, or from the streets of Brooklyn no longer mattered. If you had talent, Princeton wanted you and would foot the bill. At this point, there was nothing they couldn't get money for: topology, algebra, number theory, computer theory, operations research, and, of course, Game Theory.

And naturally, they wanted Nash. And again, we ask "why?"

I read Sylvia Nasar's well researched biography of John Nash with enormous interest. What I found most fascinating was the section about his childhood. As far as I can tell from the reference notes, Ms. Nasar went to original sources, including Nash's sister, teachers, childhood acquaintances, school records, local newspapers, and so on for her information. She did an extremely thorough job of gathering the information, but made little attempt to interpret it. She was simply recounting what she was told and what she discovered. It was an excellent job of pure reporting. And, as I noted in the previous chapter, I realized that I was reading an almost verbatim description of the childhood of Frank Scott, as described to me by Frank Scott himself.

Because of all of the recent research we have done on psychopaths (AKA antisocial personality disorder), as I read I recognized the psychopathic personality being described in detail in Nasar's account, right down to Nash's admission to another mathematician at MIT that, as a child, he "enjoyed torturing animals."

By the time I had finished the book, I had the idea that psychopathy and "mind control" activity was a better explanation for Nash's so-called "paranoid schizophrenia," which was somewhat mysterious in terms of onset, symptoms and later remission. As I was reading, I kept thinking about another article I had read describing psychopaths as "alien reaction machines." Several other connections were made, as the reader will see, and whether it is a conscious conspiracy or not, I will leave to the reader's judgment. I just know that the picture that is being revealed is frightening.

Of course, I am not a psychiatrist nor a psychologist. I am a very good "technician" in terms of hypnotherapy, but I have always advocated following the therapeutic models of professional clinicians, which I studied, implemented, and observed in order to come to some ideas about what did or did not work. And so, again, rather than just make a bold statement that I think this is what the problem is, since I am neither trained nor qualified to diagnose mental conditions, I will just present the information I have gathered on the subject and leave it to the reader to judge.

Based on the research I have read, the importance of psychopathy in the present day cannot be overstated. Simply put, it is a growing phenomenon and it is going to impact every single one of us individually and collectively in the not-too-distant future. It is also extremely important to understand psychopathy in order to be able to fully understand Game Theory and how it is the underlying dynamic being used at the present time to move all the pieces into place for the Secret Games of the Gods. There is so much literature on the subject that what I am going to include here will only skim the surface. I will, however, urge every single reader to do their own research on this subject at the soonest possible opportunity. As the C's say: knowledge protects, and the knowledge of the functional modes of the psychopath could save your life.

After reading through a slew of books and papers, reviewing in my mind the many experiences I have had with other people, searching for clues and assessing interactions, my personal preference is for the work of Dr. Robert Hare. Because of my own life experiences, it is my opinion that his professional opinion and presentation is the most concise and to the point, and also most realistic with practical hands-on understanding conveyed in simple language. One of the most important things about his work is the fact that he makes it quite clear that we cannot excuse psychopathy based on environment. The "Nature vs. Nurture" argument is overwhelmingly answered as "nature." The implications this has for all of us are deep and profound. Something, or somebody, seems to have set things up so that these kinds of genes will propagate widely and produce many "offspring" at this point in our history. And when we have a look at Nash, something of an "experiment" in their program, we will have a much better idea of what we are facing.

Psychopathy is a personality disorder defined by a distinctive cluster of behaviors and inferred personality traits, most of which society views as pejorative. It is therefore no light matter to diagnose an individual as a psychopath. Like any psychiatric disorder, diagnosis is based on the accumulation of evidence that an individual satisfies at least the minimal criteria for the disorder. [Robert Hare, Without Conscience, Guilford Press, 1999]

Notice above that the only thing that can really be said about the psychology of psychopaths is inferred from a "cluster of behaviors." This is one of the big problems of the subject. Psychopaths just simply do not ever consider that there is anything wrong with them, and as a result, they do not ever willingly seek psychiatric help unless it is part of a plan to deceive or con someone, or if they are incarcerated and obliged one way or another to submit to psychiatric examination. Even then, because of the nature of the psychopath, it is highly questionable that what they reveal in such interviews is an accurate representation of what really goes on inside them. And so, having a real live psychopath turn himself in and tell the truth about what goes on in his head just isn't part of the reality. However, there have been a number of recent studies of psychopathic prisoners using advanced brain study technology, and this has helped to sort out the "real from the fake" to a great extent.

Continue to page 275

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .