Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 29

Let's go back and take another look at the fact that a "rising of Sothis" was noted on the back of the medical Ebers Papyrus on the 9th of Epiphi in the 9th year of Amenhotep I. One might think that this was a very important item to write it on the back of a valuable papyrus. Just what was this "rising of Sothis?" Let's just speculate that it was the sighting of some cyclical something that was known about from ancient times. Let's hypothesize that it is a cluster of comets traveling together, looking for all the world like sharp, gleaming teeth in the blackness of the sky. Sothis, the "sharp toothed" one. We then jump to curious remark written on the back of the Rhind papyrus:

Regnal year 11, second month of shomu - Heliopolis was entered. First month of akhet, day 23 - the Bull of the South gores his way as far as Tjaru. Day 25 - it was heard tell that Tjaru had been entered. Regnal year 11, first month of akhet, the birthday of Seth - a roar was emitted by the Majesty of this god. The birthday of Isis - the sky poured rain.

And then, that most interesting record inscribed on a stela of King Ahmose from the same period:

The sky came on with a torrent of rain, and [dark]ness covered the western heavens while the storm raged without cessation…[the rain thundered] on the mountains (louder) than the noise at the Cavern that is in Abydos. Then every house and barn where they might have sought refuge [was swept away … and they] were drenched with water like reed canoes … and for a period of […] days no light shone in the Two Lands...

But here is where we run into a certain problem. You see, what the Ebers papyrus actually says is: "Year 9 of King Zeserkere."

Oops. Who is King Zeserkere?

Who the heck knows! Egyptologists certainly don't! But, let me also point out that if I am correct and the so-called Sothic cycle is actually a 3600 year cycle, then that means the founding of Memphis occurred at the beginning of the previous cycle. That is to say, add 3600 years to 1628 and we find the reign of Narmer-Menes to have been circa 5200 BC. This, actually, is something that "fits." Egyptologists generally date the "founding of Memphis" to around 5,000 BC. Therefore, if a Sothic Cycle is really the 3600 year cycle of cometary showers, then we ought to date the references to the sighting of Sothis to around 1600 BC.

Now, what are we to make of all of this? It's fairly evident that something is definitely being hidden from us, and it is singularly catastrophic. In fact, it is damn scary. However, we believe that having accurate information about these matters is not just important, but that it is CRUCIAL.

The Cassiopaeans have given us the clues. We have followed and are continuing to follow them and make discoveries that are grounded in scientific fact. We have discovered that there is, indeed, a Control System; that the influence of science has been to institute a form of Thought Control. But it most certainly does not operate the way the Rumormongers and purveyors of hysterical, half-baked theories would have us believe. What is more, there is much, much more to this matter at the present time than meets the eye. There are many other clues, and we are making discoveries regarding these clues almost daily. We are also coming under increasing financial pressure that is obviously an attempt to prevent further discoveries, as well as deliberate attacks from various "cells" of the Thought Police intended to dissuade us from pursuing our present research.

What do I think? I think that, based on what the Cassiopaeans have said, supported by our research to this point, it is very likely that we are already experiencing some of the comets from the cluster that has been cycling through the solar system on that 3600 year orbit. In fact, we - or our Moon - may get hit by a couple of small ones in the next year or two. But I think that, for the most part, this former group has lost its potency. It is scattered and dissipated. Indeed, it seems likely that it is time for the birth of a new cluster from "between the thighs of the Ennead."

I think that we will witness some amazing astronomical phenomena in the next few years. "Signs in the Sun and Moon." I think that the powerful activity of the Sun during this present sunspot maximum has been because its companion is drawing close. It is not yet close enough to be seen, but that will probably change. We may see it in the next year or two. There will be more solar activity. The companion star will be seen to "interact" with its primary similar to observations of other binary star interactions. A "hieros gamos" of cosmic proportions will take place. Earthquakes will shake the earth. Volcanoes will erupt. Sitchin will go on a veritable world tour of lectures declaring that this is the appearance of Nibiru and that he was "the first" to predict it. He will be lionized, courted, interviewed, and trotted out on all the television shows. Oprah will kiss his cheek and Art Bell will give him a regular spot.

But the important thing to remember is this: It will not be a planet Nibiru. There is no "Planet Nibiru." But there IS a sun's companion, Nemesis. And, even if this companion star is seen, it will never enter the inner solar system. Scientific observation indicates that this is not the way these types of bodies interact with each other. The closest that Nemesis will come is probably the orbit of Pluto. It will then "go away." Everyone will settle down and think that nothing is going to happen. Sitchin will be disgraced because his predicted giant planet won't do what he says it will do. Oprah will no longer take his calls, and Art Bell will not answer his faxes.

But that will not be the end of the matter. Because the important thing to remember about the appearance of a Dark Star at the outer reaches of our solar system is that, in order to get close enough to be seen, it has to pass through the Oort cloud and the Kuiper belt - like a bowling ball through a row of pins. What is more, the macrocosmic quantum changes that could result from an interaction between a binary star system are too poorly known, and these may contribute to an entirely different cometary intinerary. Comets that are slammed into the Solar System by a gravitationally heavy object may proceed rather more quickly than one would suppose. Also, they may have begun their journey a very long time ago when the companion star first approached the Oort cloud, in which case, they may be well on their way.

And so, in addition to whatever is left over of a cyclical cometary swarm from the previous interaction with our Sun's companion, there will be a whole new grouping. Allow me to quote from Ark's introduction to our book The Noah Syndrome before we move on to the next stage in the Global COINTELPRO operation, the Secret Games of the Gods:

One of the chief proponents of catastrophe theory in the last century was Immanuel Velikovsky. Criticisms aimed at Velikovsky included remarks stating that his vision “showed little respect for the laws of physics: In his books, planets change orbits - in blatant violation of the laws of mechanics - and go crashing into other planets.” [P.M. Dauber and R.A. Muller, "The Three Big Bangs",Helix Books, Addison-Wesley, Reading Massacussetts, 1996]

Is this attack really justified? Is talk about jumping planets evidence of ignorance, as the authors of Three Big Bangs seem to imply?

In a paper published in a collection entitled: The Stability of the Solar System and of Small Stellar Systems, Jeno M. Barnothy [J.M. Barnothy, "Can the solar system be quantized?", in Proceedings of the IAU Symposium 62, 'The Stability of the Solar System and of Small Stellar Systems', Y. Kozai (ed.), Reidel 1974] wrote: “It is conceivable that when the Earth was formed, it occupied a higher quantum state, and by releasing energy in the form of gravitational waves ‘jumped’ to its present ‘ground state.’  I do not wish as yet to speculate on a possible gravitational wave spectrum emitted from newly formed planetary systems in the universe.”

How can such jumps occur in terms of more conventional concepts?  G.J Sussman and Jack Wisdom wrote in 1992:  “The evolution of the Solar System is chaotic.  Exponential divergence of nearby trajectories is indicative of chaotic behavior.” [Gerald Jay Sussman and Jack Wisdom, "Chaotic Evolution of the Solar System", MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, AI Memo 1359, March 1992]

Up to the present time the computer simulations that have been done [Jack Wisdom - personal correspondence] have not even attempted to take into account a possible cosmic intruder - the brown dwarf Sun’s companion whose existence and properties have been researched by R.  Muller and J.  Matese. [J.J. Matese, P.G. Whitman, D.P. Whitmire "Cometary evidence for a massive body in the outer Oort cloud", Icarus 141 (1999), 354-366, "Supportive Evidence for a Brown Dwarf Solar Companion", in Proceedings of IAU Symposium 202, "Planetary Systems in the Universe: Observation, Formation and Evolution," eds. A. Penny, P. Artymowicz, A.M. Lagrange, and S. "Nemesis. The Death Star", Weidenfeld and Nicolson, NY 1988, "The Three Big Bangs", P.M. Dauber and R.A. Muller, Helix Books, Addison-Wesley, Reading Massacussetts, 1996] They also did not try to take into account a possible fractal structure of space-time, which was the subject of a series of papers and of a monograph by French astrophysicist Laurent Nottale. [L. Nottale, "Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics: Towards a Theory of Scale Relativity", World Scientific, Singapore 1993, L. Nottale, G. Schumacher, and J. Gay, "Scale Relativity and Quantization of the Solar System", Astronomy and Astrophysics 322 (1997) 1018]

I have discussed Nottale’s rules of quantization of planetary systems in my notes in the present work.  Here it is enough to say that fractal and multidimensional structure of space-time, along the ideas put forward by many physicists, astronomers and astrophysicists, whose works are quoted in this book, make cosmic jumps plausible.  My own research added one more factor here: as discussed in this work, it is one of the conclusions of EEQT that, as a rule, couplings of quantum systems to classical ones induce chaotic behavior and fractal-like patterns of quantum jumps. [Ph. Blanchard, A. Jadczyk and A. Rauschhaupt, "How Events Come into Being: EEQT, Particle Tracks, Quantum Chaos and Tunneling Time", Journal of Modern Optics 47 (2000) 2247-2263, Ph. Blanchard, A. Jadczyk and R. Olkiewicz, "Completely Mixed Quantum Systems and Quantum Fractals", Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 148 (2001) 227-241] That may be one of the reasons why space-time is fractal-like both in micro- and in macro-scale.

The event generating algorithm that is at the foundation of EEQT can be easily modified, using cosmic scale coupling constants, to describe such jumps in terms of a piecewise deterministic Markov process, when prolonged periods of continuous evolution are interspersed by jumps of a random character.

EEQT is that it provides an algorithm for describing the history of an individual system, where jumps really take place.  Therefore it provides appropriate tools for dealing not only with micro-particles but also with cosmic bodies, as discussed in this present work.

It may also put tools into our hands that will help us to intervene in the “events” of Cosmic Catastrophe.

Noah is that one such continuous period may be coming to an end soon, and that the target quantum state after the jump is not fully determined.  Our actions, or our lack of action now, shape the probability distribution of our future “after the Flood” environment.

Paraphrasing slightly the quote from Niels Bohr's friend Piet Hein, as used in John Archibald Wheeler's Geons, Black Holes and Quantum Foam. [J.A. Wheeler and K. Ford, "Geons, Black Holes and Quantum Foam", W.W. Norton, New York1998]

We need to know
what this whole show
is all about
before it's out.

And time is running out.

Continue to Chapter 30

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .