Therein
lies the rub: knowledge. The "Photon Belt Phiasco" is a
prime example. Somebody came up with this idea and it spread like
wildfire to channel after channel... became all the rage, incorporated
with the "Mass Landing" theory and the "Alien Rapture"
hypothesis, then interwoven with Hale- Bopp... resulting in a mass suicide
as well as a HUGE amount of energy.
When I
first read it a number of years ago, in a magazine... all laid out
in pseudo-scientific terms... I nearly had a gag attack! I mean, if
the folks promulgating the idea as well as the ones reading it, had
a CLUE about what the intrinsic nature of a photon was, they would
not have fallen for this one... and NEVER MIND about all the "psychic
techno-babble" about these "special photons" and how
the sources had to use terms that were "close" to something
we poor ignorant humans could grasp or that were available in the vocabulary
of the channel... the whole thing was poppycock! I said so then, repeatedly,
the C's backed me up when they came along, and so far, the knowledge
of what photons are and what they do has held up! I mean, don't these
guys know that the earth is bombarded with TONS of photons every day...
it's called LIGHT... and if there was an increase such as they suggested...
it would REALLY transform the planet... to a CINDER!
But, on
the other hand, on the low side of probabilities, maybe a photon belt
DID hit and all the "good folks" WERE airlifted off the planet!
Then, I guess we are all in trouble!
So, it
is a VERY good idea to have an extensive knowledge base when dealing
with this stuff... BUT, there is a point at which even this sort of
"runs out" because we are dealing with levels of reality
about which we have no clue whatsoever. Many times the C's have told
me something that just completely and totally OFFENDED what I thought
I knew... I would be outraged with them! And then, some few months
down the road, something would come out in "mainstream science,"
or some new author who had been working on a specific problem, or some
work that I had not yet examined would come along verifying to the
last comma everything they said. That sort of thing just gives you
the "chills" and so forth.
I have
to admit that I was completely offended by the idea of aliens "eating"
human beings, either emotional energy- wise or literally... but then,
I came across research and documentation of at least a strong circumstantial
kind that pretty much supported this.
Also,
I was pretty hot on the Velikovsky ideas and I was pretty much unhappy
that the C's did not admire this theory as much as I did.
Most often,
with channeled material, one finds that the answers are sort of "confirmations"
of what the channel him or herself believe or WANT to hear... But,
in this instance, we can frankly say that the C's don't seem to care
much what we believe or want to hear. They don't coddle us... but
they DO become VERY VAGUE when a person is present or asks a question
who is unable to bear the blunt truth. I did an analysis of the "vague"
answers once and discovered that there was a direct relationship between
the number of them and the personalities of the people present including
their pre-formed belief systems.
So, the
bottom line seems to be: if a person is EMOTIONALLY tied up with what
they WANT to hear... they are respected and will not be told anything
that they cannot handle...
There
is SO MUCH GARBAGE out there... and much of it is written to evoke
and appeal to the emotions, and it is CLEAR that emotions are chemical.
Yes, there ARE "soul" emotions, so to speak, but they are
so radically different from what one experiences when "interfaced"
with the body that there is almost no comparison.
And this
is my idea... to raise awareness of this "battle," so that
people can be objective and non-anticipatory and be able to SEE CLEARLY
without emotion, thereby reducing the amount of "food" the
aliens can milk from us. Each one of us who wakes up and smells the
coffee, so to speak, makes it that much easier for others... Hundredth
Monkey Syndrome and all that... and THEN, there is the possibility
of effecting a change. C's repeatedly say that the future is "open."
But, unless one knows what the present conditions are and where they
can lead, probabilities and so forth, they have no hope whatsoever
of contributing to a group effort to direct our future.
Linda
Howe writes:
"An
Air Force intelligence officer once told me about an elderly colleague,
a Colonel, who supposedly spent time with an extraterrestrial biological
entity retrieved from a crashed silver disc in New Mexico. The
Colonel said the being explained telepathically that this is not
the only universe. He said, "Imagine a large island of white
sand and that each sand grain is a different universe separated from
the others by an electronic membrane. And surrounding the island
is a cold, dark, sea."
"I
asked the intelligence officer what the dark sea was and he answered,
"You don't want to know. It would change you forever."
Now, this
may seem "upsetting" to hear, but one has to consider the
perspective of the "intelligence" conveying this information.
If we take as a given what the C's said about the STS perspective,
that they "worship the physical universe," then we understand
that the "cold dark sea" perceived by the being is "non-delimited
consciousness," and, to them it IS SCARY! Unlimited creative
potential! Pure Creative Consciousness. And this is how they view
it... as a "cold dark sea."
Continue
to page 186
