Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 20

And now we come to the second line of information that has popped up in the past few days. The new movie, The Mothman Prophecies is out now, and there is a great deal of commentary being made in various metaphysical/paranormal research circles. Both Fortean Times and Fate magazines have articles on Mothman. John Keel, the original investigator of the Mothman case writes in the recent issue of Fate:

In 1966-68, over 100 people in Point Pleasant, West Virginia, and the surrounding area reported seeing a giant, winged creature. This critter was usually described as being taller than a big man, with blazing red eyes and a wingspan of only ten feet. Yet it was able to fly faster than a speeding car.

Yet the creature failed to leave footprints, feces, or other physical evidence. After a flurry of sightings over a two-year period, it seemed to vanish forever. This proved once again that eyewitness testimony is of little value when you are dealing with fortean events. A thousand people could all see the same thing at the same time and it still isn't proof that the object or entity is a real, physical, corporeal resident of our dimension. [Fate Magazine, Jan-Feb 2002, p. 8]

The most fascinating article in the present offerings is about journalist Rick Moran's 1978 investigation of the Mothman phenomenon. Mr. Moran points out in his article that the protocols of "writers," in generic terms, and "journalists" are not the same. He had the idea that "field researchers looking into cases of the unexplained should adopt the tenets of investigative journalism; to look at the human stories together with the unvarnished facts (insofar as they could be discovered). This might better help us understand strange events than either the logical data and natural skepticism of scientists or the effort of so-called paranormal researchers looking for proof of their pre-existing beliefs."

We couldn't agree more. The C's comments on Mothman connected it to a broader phenomenon base which, as we will see, is supported by lateral evidence:

And yes, we asked the C's about it:

06-09-95
Q: (L) I read in a book about a monster called the "Beast of Gevaudan which appeared first in 1764 and was supposedly done away with in 1767. Who or what was this beast?
A: Other dimensional "window faller."
Q: (L) You mean it fell into our dimension from another through a dimensional window?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, that would explain a lot of things about it. What about the creature known as "Spring Heel Jack" who terrorized England some time ago?
A: Same.
Q: (L) What about the Mothman in West Virginia?
A: Same.
Q: (L) So, windows to other dimensions are the explanation for a whole host of strange things?
A: Yes.

Which leads to a related series of questions:

11-19-94
Q: (L) In the Ann Haywood case which is supposed to be a case of demonic possession or obsession, who or what are the beings that are afflicting this woman and her family?
A: 3rd density section "B" energy anomalies same as "poltergeist."
Q: (L) The case that is described in the book The Haunted, about the Smurl family, with quite a bit of phenomena occurring in their house including the sighting of a big-foot type creature, what is the source of the phenomena in that case?
A: Same.
Q: (L) So, neither of those cases are "alien" related?
A: Correct.
Q: (L) Why are there such marked similarities between those two cases and the case described by Karla Turner and other alien abductions?
A: Similarities are open to interpretation. Turner household was opened to multiple types of phenomena due to interaction with Grays and others.
Q: (L) Does that occur frequently in interactions with Grays?
A: When there is excessive activity of this sort it leaves open channels or "windows" which allows all sorts of things to come through.

After reading John Keel's "Mothman," Moran just assumed that Keel had followed the protocols of the author of popular books and not the more stringent journalistic "rules." He was warned that he ought not to compare Keel with other writers because he was a good researcher and not prone to hyping his subject.

Continue to page 160

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .