Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 11

I need now to give just a little background about the situation over in Poland. I can't talk about his ex-wife because I never knew her. I only knew her by what she had done, and much of that is personal, so I won't go into it. But the reader may have some idea of what kind of person she is by the fact that, two days after he told her he wanted a divorce, she went to the bank where all their money was and drew it all out, and it has never been seen since.

Now, we aren't talking about just a little bit of money here. The reader should remember that Ark spent most of his career traveling and working at some of the world's most prestigious European universities. He was well paid, and expenses in Poland were low (as was the pay). He habitually lived economically so that he could put as much money in the bank as possible, often existing on hot dogs and instant potatoes for weeks on end to save money. Because of the favorable exchange rate, he managed to accumulate what amounts to a considerable fortune. He paid for an apartment in a high-rise, had two cars, and essentially was considered to be a wealthy man. On top of all that, he was awarded a Humboldt Prize in 1995, and it was a significant chunk of cash.

And it was all gone. She didn't say a word, simply went to the bank and took everything. When he went to the bank on his lunch hour to cash a check for pocket money, he was told that he no longer had any accounts, no CD's, nothing. All gone.

Well, naturally he was curious and wished to know where 30 years worth of money accumulated by his self-denial and careful management had gone. She told him that she gave it all to the church to pay for masses for his soul since he was being evilly influenced to ask for a divorce. No mention was made, of course, to any of her contributions to his desire for a divorce. She had always been perfect. So I won't describe the 30 years of entries in his journal that chronicle her behavior, except to mention the fact that she hired a private detective to follow their daughter's husband around because she didn't like him and wanted to discover something that she could blackmail him with in order to force him to agree to divorce her daughter so she could resume control of the daughter's life. We'll just leave it at that.

In any event, Ark was without money, and she worked herself up to such a state of frenzied violence that he knew (from experience) that she was going to begin mutilating herself so she could run outside and scream that he had beat her. So, to forestall that possibility, he knew that he must never, ever, be in her presence alone. He left with the clothes on his back, and went to live with his mother. From that point on, his ex-wife refused to appear in court when over half a dozen hearings were scheduled. She refused to hire an attorney. She repeatedly sent doctor's notes that she was "unwell."

You can't divorce somebody you can't get into court. And without getting her into court, nothing could be decided about the equitable division of property. Ark was advised by his attorney to press criminal charges against her because her theft of his money was a crime. Since he had announced his intention to divorce, it had been illegal for her to take anything until the court ruled on who got what. Ark couldn't do it. As he said to me, it was worth a fortune to find me and escape from her. He had spent the entire winter before he came to the States, trudging through the snow while his soon to be ex wife drove by in the new car he had bought just a few months earlier. She even refused to allow him to retrieve any of his clothes. So that is where the matter stood when he returned to Poland.

And the airline delivered his luggage to his old home address on file when the tickets were purchased.

04-12-97
[...}
Q: Who was responsible for the lost luggage?
A: Polish authorities.
Q: Let me go back to the luggage. The Polish authorities, as in which branch?
A: Secret police.
Q: What were they looking for? Just anything?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they satisfy themselves that there was nothing subversive in there?
A: Yes.
Q: Why, then, did they cause the luggage to be delivered where it was?
A: Honest mistake.
Q: (L) Was this mistake stimulated by the Lizzies?
A: In that vein, there is little in your STS locator that is not, ultimately.
Q: What was the reaction of the recipient of the luggage?
A: Stunned.
Q: Was I correct when I thought that there was rushing off to find someone to translate the tape?
A: Well, it was more like rushing off to "find my lawyer."
Q: Is this information going to be used in a detrimental way against him?
A: Yes.
Q: Is the luggage going to be returned?
A: Wait and see... "Stay tuned, fasten your seat belts," etc...
Q: Anything further you can give to help me sleep tonight?
A: Ask...
Q: Is it going to prolong the proceedings?
A: Open.
Q: Will she show up at the hearing?
A: Will most likely ask for a delay, based upon "new information," to be entered into evidence.
Q: Would it be a good idea for him to suggest that he can get an American divorce?
A: Good idea!!
Q: Should it be let out so that she will hear of it?
A: Why not proceed discreetly?
Q: Would it be advisable to pursue the money issue?
A: It might be advisable for A to simply concentrate upon his new beginning as opposed to the old, dead past...
Q: Does that mean that he will not be able to get the legal affairs straightened out in Poland?
A: This is a complicated situation which will unfold in a proper way if handled in a positive, forward looking manner.
Q: Forward looking would be looking to the future?
A: Yes.
Q: Does that mean looking out for some of his interests?
A: See previous response.
Q: My original thought was that he should just walk away from it, let her have it. There are other opportunities.
A: Look ahead, not back.
Q: I think that the pictures and tape will be gone when he gets the luggage back.
A: Wait and see.
[I was right]
Q: Why was she stunned at what was in the luggage?
A: Think of all that was in the luggage, and you will know the answer to that question.
Q: Was it the pictures?
A: See previous answer, obsession aideth not, my dear!
Q: I am not obsessed! I am curious.
A: Worry not, just sit back and enjoy the show!
Q: I can't enjoy myself if I think she is going to make him suffer!
A: No more on this!

It was two days of phone tag before he discovered what had happened. He knew that he had to retrieve his luggage, and he made arrangements with another professor and friend at the institute to accompany him to get his possessions.

After an unpleasant scene, he was finally able to open his suitcase and unpack. The customs seal was intact, so it was a certainty that no one had opened the bag. Yet, the tape, the journal, the manila envelope of photographs, and the pages of correspondence with Sue Brana were all missing.

And the C's were right on the money. The next hearing was scheduled for June 17, on the very day Ark was scheduled to leave for Dijon, followed by a stay in Gottingen, and then on to Florence. But even before that, he was scheduled to spend two weeks in Bielefeld. Meanwhile, he was working very hard on the details of the upcoming Xth Max Born Symposium that he was organizing with two colleagues, sponsored by a list of luminary organizations in Poland, Great Britain and Germany. He certainly had his hands full with such an exhausting travel schedule, and every day was an uphill battle to keep the ship of the upcoming conference on course. With 25 of the world's most eminent physicists scheduled to speak, coordinating the schedule, arranging for their travel and accommodations, making sure everybody's needs would be met, was an overwhelming task. Ark delegated as much as possible to his staff, but in the end, he had to make the call on the big decisions.

When the day of the hearing finally arrived, again, the soon-to-be-ex-wife did not appear. Again she sent a letter asking for a delay. However, the court was getting rather impatient with these manipulations. Ark described the event in an email:

Subject: news
Date sent: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:52:06

A did not appear. She sent a letter and asked for 4 months of delay because of "psychic health" reasons. The Court did not agree arguing that everybody divorcing suffers psychic tensions. Rescheduled for July 22 when the session will be held even in absence of A.

A admitted on paper that she has the Journal and tapes!

Her letter states, in part, that I have been taken over by a mind-control cult because of my "interdisciplinary interests," i.e. anything she thinks is "strange." She wrote:

"These interests (my interdisciplinary) in recent times, i.e. since June 1966, through the Internet, became continuous contacts with a group of people which, as they claim, have contact with extraterrestial civilization, that is with Cassiopaeans. In this way he got to know a woman, named Laura, and he remains under her influence.

"From this time on he tells his colleagues about his love for Laura, his plans of living together with her. He says that he wants to have a child with her and also take care of her five children.

Proof: (names of witnesses)"

"In his journal he describes his emotional states and his supernatural love which he feels towards Laura. He seeks advice from her, she is giving him horoscopes, sends him cassettes with "motivating" recordings. From his notes it also follows that he is financing enterprise of this Laura and the group of people contacting the Cassiopaeans."

Proof: journal from October-November 1996"

My God!

Bernard, his wife and two other friends will witness for A that I was proposing to give her apartment and car and half of the money if she agrees to the divorce.

Then she argued (on paper) that she stole the money to save it from being given to a "group"...

Somehow she is totally unaware that the fact that she has taken these things from my luggage makes her guilty without any doubt to everybody including her attorney. And that alone is a sufficient reason to ask for a divorce. She seems to be also totally unaware (and her attorney was not able to explain it to her) that the fact that she prevents me from spending my part of the money however I wish is another sufficient-in-itself reason to ask for a divorce.

Marek noticed these two things instantly.

I believe the judges also noticed. The main judge was very nice, flatly dismissing the demand to wait for four months.

And so the next hearing was scheduled for July 22, come Hell or High Water.

As it happened, both came.

Continue to Chapter 12

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .