| 
               
 
 
 
   | 
 
          
        Adventures 
          With Cassiopaea  Chapter 
        9    
  Another 
        example of this that deals directly with Frank's growing resentment that 
        he was not being given top billing is the next excerpt. We had gotten 
        into a discussion about it because he had started another of his "pity 
        me" rants and I had just told him in a joking way that if he started 
        on that again I was going to throw something at him. He became all upset 
        that I had used a word describing a physical act of "violence." 
        I pointed out that the "violence" was only words spoken in defending 
        myself against his words which were, effectively, doing violence to me 
        because they were draining my energy.What was more, it was merely a metaphor, 
        and he knew I really wasn't going to throw anything at him. But he just 
        wanted to argue, so I suggested that sometimes, one had to do or say something 
        to make the point. What is interesting about this one is the fact that 
        the following excerpt generally contradicts the information given in the 
        session about Frank's many rants as being his way of "fighting back." 
        Of course, as I have already mentioned, the truth was coming through then, 
        though it was being skewed by Frank's agenda. The same is true in the 
        following:  
        June 1, 
          1996Q: (L) Frank and I would like to have a comment on our dispute.
 A: Ask.
 Q: (F) I don't know what to ask. (L) Well, Frank says that violence 
          is NEVER an appropriate response to words.
 A: Okay.
 Q: (L) I say that under some circumstances, it may be the only response.
 A: Why do you say that?
 Q: (L) Because there do exist situations where words are used repeatedly 
          to harm another. One example is the Nazi propaganda machine. If someone 
          had shot Goebbels, it might have saved a lot of people from dying.
 A: No.
 Q: (L) Well, of course. There would have been someone else. Still, 
          the point is, words can be used to destroy, and words of power can be 
          used to kill. Sometimes words can be a lot more hurtful to the soul 
          than physical acts.
 A: Not directly.
 Q: (L) Well, directly, or indirectly, it still amounts to the same thing.
 A: No.
 Q: (L) Well, I know you are not going to agree with me.
 A: This is a subject that demands further exploration, in order to bring 
          about a definitive answer.
 Q: (L) Go ahead. Explain it to me.
 A: Words only have power if the receiver believes they do.
 Q: (L) But, in many cases, that belief exists.
 A: The power to control belief lies exclusively within the receiver.
 Which, of 
        course, begs the question of why it was okay for Frank to "fight 
        back" with words, but it was not okay for me to do it! In another 
        sense, however, if Frank was already "marked" as an STS individual, 
        then the answers then and in this particular session were exactly correct, 
        only I was seeing them from the idea that Frank was seeking to serve others.  
         Q: (L) 
          Let me put it this way: Frank often says things that are not precisely 
          soothing to the soul, to say the least. Most often, I ignore them. 
          But, sometimes I am not in an ignoring mood, and my response is no more 
          violent toward him than his toward me. I merely speak metaphorically. 
          When I do, I am only saying "Stop doing that!" in a figurative 
          way. But, he finds this to be as irritating to him as what he says 
          that irritates me...A: And...
 Q: (L) Well, that is about it. I have lately been verbally attacked 
          by numerous individuals... so I am not in a mood to tolerate much in 
          this line from those around me.
 A: And if this irritates you, it is because you allow it to.
 Q: (L) Fine and dandy. And it is true, and I know it. Which is why 
          I am beginning to think that I ought to simply do nothing, because my 
          feelings are too sensitive.
 A: And do you really believe that that is an unalterable condition?
 Q: (L) Well, why should I be the one who is obliged to become less sensitive, 
          and other people are not obliged to become more thoughtful about what 
          they say?
 A: You cannot control others.
 Q: (L) I don't want to control anyone. I am just saying that the obvious 
          thing is for me to simply withdraw into my own little world of reading 
          and thinking and writing, and if nothing ever comes of any of it, it 
          is utterly immaterial to me.
 And here 
        we see Frank's powerful emotional reaction. There I was, suggesting that 
        we give the entire project up, forget about the C's, forget about making 
        Frank a star, and just go back to doing what I enjoyed doing where I certainly 
        didn't have to put up with Frank or the various types of nastiness encountered 
        on the internet, from Frank, and elsewhere.  
        A: That 
          is your choice, but not a wise one!!!Q: (L) Well, you say that, but it is, as several people have pointed 
          out to me, only since we have begun this channeling project that all 
          these dreadful things have happened in my life. My life is a shambles!
 A: "Dreadful is subjective."
 Q: (L) I would say that the physical things that have happened to me, 
          the collapse of my marriage, the things that have happened to my children, 
          are pretty damn dreadful, subjectively or otherwise!
 A: Before these changes began to manifest, you were deeper into the 
          "deadly illusion" than you are now. Emergence is, by its 
          very nature, uncomfortable. But, it has and will, empower you, we promise!!!!!!!!
 Q: (L) It is a very trying time now. I am having a difficult time just 
          coping.
 A: And there have been others, and will be others, but that does not 
          mean that the rewards will be slight.
 Q: (L) Well...
 A: You are on a path of destiny, and there is no turning back now.
 Q: (S) What happened in specific? (L) Well, I was trying to explain 
          some of the material to several people, and the end result was that 
          they decided that I was possessed and that the C's were evil because 
          they say that we have to figure things out ourselves in order to graduate 
          to the next level. Including my husband.
 A: Why does this bother you? It does not bother us. They can all decide 
          that we are the "Queens of Satan," if they wish. It is free 
          will.
 Q: (L) I don't like the implied hardness... I am not a hard person.
 A: It is not hardness. The "feelings" you describe are related 
          to ego, and by relation, pride, two things that were deliberately implanted 
          into the 3rd density human psyche by the 4th density STS 309,000 years 
          ago, as you measure time. Refer to the transcripts with regard to DNA 
          alteration and the occipital ridge. Believe it or not, you, Laura, 
          will be rid of these, eventually. It is not what some individuals respond 
          to you that matters. It is sharing the information that counts. Also, 
          remember, these persons do not perceive your feelings and sensitivities 
          as keenly as you do, nor do you perceive theirs, likewise.
 That was 
        all fine and good, and I certainly couldn't argue with it in principle. 
        However, I was having some difficulty understanding how feeling hurt after 
        being attacked for sharing some of the C's material was related to "ego 
        and pride." What is more, this didn't seem like the C's I was used 
        to. Indeed, there comes a time when a person needs to "toughen up," 
        but considering the beating I had been taking for so long, these remarks 
        were singularly cold.  
        Continue 
          to Page 55  
 
  The owners and publishers 
  of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product 
  of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite 
  the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical 
  mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" 
  nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in 
  all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. 
  The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours 
  a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our 
  existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek 
  to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable 
  or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if 
  not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures. 
 Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com 
  Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All 
rights 
  reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered 
  trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
 Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become 
  the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
 Republication 
  and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website 
  in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
   
       You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive]
.   |