|
Adventures
With Cassiopaea
Chapter
9
Another
example of this that deals directly with Frank's growing resentment that
he was not being given top billing is the next excerpt. We had gotten
into a discussion about it because he had started another of his "pity
me" rants and I had just told him in a joking way that if he started
on that again I was going to throw something at him. He became all upset
that I had used a word describing a physical act of "violence."
I pointed out that the "violence" was only words spoken in defending
myself against his words which were, effectively, doing violence to me
because they were draining my energy.What was more, it was merely a metaphor,
and he knew I really wasn't going to throw anything at him. But he just
wanted to argue, so I suggested that sometimes, one had to do or say something
to make the point. What is interesting about this one is the fact that
the following excerpt generally contradicts the information given in the
session about Frank's many rants as being his way of "fighting back."
Of course, as I have already mentioned, the truth was coming through then,
though it was being skewed by Frank's agenda. The same is true in the
following:
June 1,
1996
Q: (L) Frank and I would like to have a comment on our dispute.
A: Ask.
Q: (F) I don't know what to ask. (L) Well, Frank says that violence
is NEVER an appropriate response to words.
A: Okay.
Q: (L) I say that under some circumstances, it may be the only response.
A: Why do you say that?
Q: (L) Because there do exist situations where words are used repeatedly
to harm another. One example is the Nazi propaganda machine. If someone
had shot Goebbels, it might have saved a lot of people from dying.
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, of course. There would have been someone else. Still,
the point is, words can be used to destroy, and words of power can be
used to kill. Sometimes words can be a lot more hurtful to the soul
than physical acts.
A: Not directly.
Q: (L) Well, directly, or indirectly, it still amounts to the same thing.
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, I know you are not going to agree with me.
A: This is a subject that demands further exploration, in order to bring
about a definitive answer.
Q: (L) Go ahead. Explain it to me.
A: Words only have power if the receiver believes they do.
Q: (L) But, in many cases, that belief exists.
A: The power to control belief lies exclusively within the receiver.
Which, of
course, begs the question of why it was okay for Frank to "fight
back" with words, but it was not okay for me to do it! In another
sense, however, if Frank was already "marked" as an STS individual,
then the answers then and in this particular session were exactly correct,
only I was seeing them from the idea that Frank was seeking to serve others.
Q: (L)
Let me put it this way: Frank often says things that are not precisely
soothing to the soul, to say the least. Most often, I ignore them.
But, sometimes I am not in an ignoring mood, and my response is no more
violent toward him than his toward me. I merely speak metaphorically.
When I do, I am only saying "Stop doing that!" in a figurative
way. But, he finds this to be as irritating to him as what he says
that irritates me...
A: And...
Q: (L) Well, that is about it. I have lately been verbally attacked
by numerous individuals... so I am not in a mood to tolerate much in
this line from those around me.
A: And if this irritates you, it is because you allow it to.
Q: (L) Fine and dandy. And it is true, and I know it. Which is why
I am beginning to think that I ought to simply do nothing, because my
feelings are too sensitive.
A: And do you really believe that that is an unalterable condition?
Q: (L) Well, why should I be the one who is obliged to become less sensitive,
and other people are not obliged to become more thoughtful about what
they say?
A: You cannot control others.
Q: (L) I don't want to control anyone. I am just saying that the obvious
thing is for me to simply withdraw into my own little world of reading
and thinking and writing, and if nothing ever comes of any of it, it
is utterly immaterial to me.
And here
we see Frank's powerful emotional reaction. There I was, suggesting that
we give the entire project up, forget about the C's, forget about making
Frank a star, and just go back to doing what I enjoyed doing where I certainly
didn't have to put up with Frank or the various types of nastiness encountered
on the internet, from Frank, and elsewhere.
A: That
is your choice, but not a wise one!!!
Q: (L) Well, you say that, but it is, as several people have pointed
out to me, only since we have begun this channeling project that all
these dreadful things have happened in my life. My life is a shambles!
A: "Dreadful is subjective."
Q: (L) I would say that the physical things that have happened to me,
the collapse of my marriage, the things that have happened to my children,
are pretty damn dreadful, subjectively or otherwise!
A: Before these changes began to manifest, you were deeper into the
"deadly illusion" than you are now. Emergence is, by its
very nature, uncomfortable. But, it has and will, empower you, we promise!!!!!!!!
Q: (L) It is a very trying time now. I am having a difficult time just
coping.
A: And there have been others, and will be others, but that does not
mean that the rewards will be slight.
Q: (L) Well...
A: You are on a path of destiny, and there is no turning back now.
Q: (S) What happened in specific? (L) Well, I was trying to explain
some of the material to several people, and the end result was that
they decided that I was possessed and that the C's were evil because
they say that we have to figure things out ourselves in order to graduate
to the next level. Including my husband.
A: Why does this bother you? It does not bother us. They can all decide
that we are the "Queens of Satan," if they wish. It is free
will.
Q: (L) I don't like the implied hardness... I am not a hard person.
A: It is not hardness. The "feelings" you describe are related
to ego, and by relation, pride, two things that were deliberately implanted
into the 3rd density human psyche by the 4th density STS 309,000 years
ago, as you measure time. Refer to the transcripts with regard to DNA
alteration and the occipital ridge. Believe it or not, you, Laura,
will be rid of these, eventually. It is not what some individuals respond
to you that matters. It is sharing the information that counts. Also,
remember, these persons do not perceive your feelings and sensitivities
as keenly as you do, nor do you perceive theirs, likewise.
That was
all fine and good, and I certainly couldn't argue with it in principle.
However, I was having some difficulty understanding how feeling hurt after
being attacked for sharing some of the C's material was related to "ego
and pride." What is more, this didn't seem like the C's I was used
to. Indeed, there comes a time when a person needs to "toughen up,"
but considering the beating I had been taking for so long, these remarks
were singularly cold.
Continue
to Page 55
The owners and publishers
of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product
of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite
the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical
mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism"
nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in
all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth.
The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours
a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our
existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek
to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable
or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if
not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.
Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All
rights
reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered
trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become
the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication
and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website
in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive]
.
|