|
|
The Bridges - Jadczyk CorrespondenceFrom: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net> To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net> Subject: (Fwd) Re: OT:Mysteries of Coral Castle Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net Date sent: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:48:52 -0400
Hi, Guess you don't like the C's anymore since they say some "weird and different" things!
But, anyway... finally found the books in UK and ordered them. Brotherhood of Light seems to have disappeared from the net...
Here is a funny "connection" to the alchemy business that was an "interwoven" part of the subject. I started to post it to the list, but decided against it.
I've been going over Gardner's genealogies and trying to figure out his agenda... seems pretty clear that he HAS one... and this may be deliberate or it may be "inspired" from other "realms." He talks out of both sides of his mouth at once. Several of his references are pretty shoddy sources in general scholarly opinion - which may or may not mean something.
Have been reading F. David Peats book on Synchronicity and finding a lot of applicable remarks to the "process" I have experienced with this subject. Also, read a book with a remark about alchemy that sort of fits. That the cells of the body "sing" at a certain point and that reminded me of this:
Q: Alright. I want to clear up some quick ones before I get into the more complicated subjects. Left from last week: We talked about the statue of the Virgin of Candelaria, and the mode of its appearance. But, I want to know what year it arrived on the Canaries? A: No year was measured then. Q: Well, I know the Guanches did not, but related to the Spaniards who arrived later and who learned about it, when was it? A: Maybe 1198 would be good. Q: Now, I notice that the Celtic name for the town of St. Albans is Verulamium, and that is where Henry Percy, son of Hotspur, was killed in battle. I also notice that Sir Francis Bacon was Lord Verulam, and he was thought to be not only a Rosicrucian, but also the author of the Shakespearean plays, as well as some of the Rosicrucian manifestos... A: Check out Alton Towers, for clues. Q: Okay, I will do that. Thank you. Okay. Now, there is a thing called the GONG project on Tenerife. My feeling is that it is a mask for something else. A: Close. Q: What, precisely, is the GONG project doing? A: Magnetic frequency. Measurements for possible future use. Q: Future use for what purpose? A: Discovery. Oh, you are so "brilliant." Q: Is brilliant the code word for the discovery here? A: You will see. Q: You guys are so funny! Next: Is there any relation between the dietary restrictions of the Jews and the instructions for animal sacrifice on the alter as delivered in the book of Leviticus, and the present day cattle mutilations and possible use of humans for food? A: Disconnected variables. Q: Okay, let's back up: is there any relationship between the instructions for animal sacrifice and the cattle mutes? A: Only in the general sense of enzyme actions upon leukocytes. Q: Does that mean that the instructions for preparation of sacrificial animals were designed to prepare them for alien 'food?' A: More for energy transfer. Q: Do you mean energy transfer in the a) sense of the transfer of the energy of the animal through the sacrifice, or b) the transfer of the energy of the human performing the sacrifice into the animal, and then through the animal to the alien (and I am using the term alien in its broadest sense) ? A: Why not both? Q: The next thing is the dietary restrictions. Many cultures eat rabbits and pigs, in specific, those of Aryan extraction. The rabbit was sacred to Athena, and the Celts at a LOT of pork. Yet, here these items are restricted from the diet of the Jews. Is there any relation between the diet as outlined here, and the Aryan genetic tendencies to conquest and domination? A: Trichinosis used to be nonexistent in Aryan types... But, mixing of genetic factors eliminated this. Q: So, the Jews were susceptible to trichonosis, and the Aryans were not? A: Originally. Q: So, it was necessary for the Jews not to eat the pork, but not for the Aryans, and the mixing caused susceptibility. In a general sense, are strong Aryan genetics indicative of the necessity for the consumption of meat? A: In a sense, but pescadorial features substitute semi- adequately. Q: Pescadorial. Semi-adequately. What needed to be added so that the substitution would be not just semi-adequate, but totally adequate? A: Iron/protein levels. Q: So, it is the iron that the Celts need? Well, that brings me to the next question: In all the Celtic folklore when they talk about 'fairies,' which are obviously other density beings very similar to our modern 'Gray alien,' these fairy/slash aliens insist that no iron come near them in any way. It was also said that bringing iron into contact with someone thought to be a 'changeling' would prove whether or not they were because if they were, they would disappear instantly. Also, the instructions for the building of the Temple of Solomon included restrictions on the use of iron in either the preparation of the materials or the putting together of the building itself, even down to the rejection of the use of iron nails in any part. What is the significance of this restriction on the use of iron by these other density beings, whoever they are? A: Bloodline trails. Q: Are you saying that... I don't understand... not even well enough to frame another question... A: You will, my dear, oh will you! Q: If it was necessary for the Aryans to have iron... okay, maybe the iron is something that interacts... A: What about iron as an element? Q: Okay, let's see: Iron - derived from early Celt 'iserno,' via Illyrian 'eisarno' from the IndoEuropean base 'eis,' which means to 'move vigorously; strong, holy.' It is a white, malleable, ductile, metallic chemical element that can be readily magnetized, rusts rapidly in moist or salty air, and is vital to plant and animal life; it is the most common and important of all metals, and its alloys, as steel, are extensively used. Symbol: Fe; atomic weight:55.847; atomic number: 26; specific gravity: 7.86; melting point: 1535 degrees Centigrade; boiling point 3,000 degrees C. The electron shells are thus: 2,14,8,2. Iron is an element of blood, hemoglobin, and is easily magnetized... there is some new work about iron and magnetite in the brains of people who are psychic or have 'abduction' experiences... is it the magnetism? A: Yes.... Q: Is it something that holds one more firmly in 3rd density, and the elimination of it enables one to switch densities... or... A: Tis magnetite that acts as a conduit, and perhaps, just perhaps, allows for transference back and forth at will?!? And what about the legend about the alchemists? Is not the key term there really transformation?!? And has not the "smoke screen" really been delivered so effectively by all the concentration upon the substance?!? And does not this remind one indeed of all the misguided concentration upon substance rather than meaning that one finds so regularly on 3rd density?? Q: I get it! So, it is the magnetite in the body, that collects and holds the charge, and it has absolutely nothing to do with an external substance at all! Is that it? A: You are getting "warmer." Q: Am I right, we need more iron for magnetite, or am I completely off base here? A: You are right, but, do not underestimate the significance of that just delivered! What better deception than to divert the meaning of alchemy, by focusing upon substance, then addicting those souls bound to 3rd density to the substance? Q: Okay, it is the magnetite that acts as a conduit. And the concentration is upon the substance, that is, the magnetite. Let me conjecture that the thing that is believed to be distilled out of the alchemical operations is magnetite, is that correct? A: No, because no need, if not deceived by other efforts. Q: Were these other efforts involved with sexual function? A: More like the results of same. Q: Okay, they were concentrating on... A: Today's version of the deception could be your favorite and mine, "monoatomic gold." Q: Oh, the David Hudson fiasco... A: There too, one is lead astray by substance... Remember our little dissertation about all the really big bangs? Q: Yes.... I remember... and I got a lot of flack from that... The three days of darkness, et cetera... the implications... let's back up... A: Oh my, oh my, we can turn this powder into gold!! And if you eat enough of it, you will have orgasms forever as a light being... Oh my, oh my!! Q: Good point! Getting people addicted to the substance by these claims... A: How addicted is Marti? Q: Yes. She is the one who is really promoting the David Hudson thing... A: Did she want to have orgasms in heaven, or what?!? Q: That's true! That was her idea of heaven - the Hindu lingam and yoni in perpetual motion! Is there something else on this now, or can we move on? A: Up to you. ***********************
Q: Okay. I learned the other day that the University of Montpelier was founded and that among the individuals who attended this university was Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Roger Bacon, Arnold of Villanova and Ramon Llul, as well as Michl Nostredame. Now, aside from the fact that all these people attended, they all seem to be somehow connected to the city of Cologne. In fact, Albertus Magnus moved to the city of Cologne, and he was the teacher of Thomas Aquinas and they both wrote about a 'talking head' and, apparently, Albertus Magnus performed something of a miracle along the Rhine in a field... was this, by any chance, an alfalfa field? A: Yes. Q: And, is this OUR alfalfa field? A: Close. Q: It is said that 3 years is the normal time required for the master work when proceeding by the 'white path,' or the 'humid way.' Is this, essentially true? Three years for the transformation? A: Here, "time" serves as an illusion. Q: Raymond Lully was rumored to have transformed a great deal of base metal into gold for Edward II of England. Did Raymond transmute for Edward in 1311 or 1312? A: Only method which will accomplish this uses high
pitched
melodic sounds, brought forth while in a trance state. Q: Brought forth from what, the human voice? A: From the center of within. Q: Well, back to my question, did Raymond transmute gold for Edward, because there was supposedly some special treatment given Lully by Edward, and we know that Edward II was the arch enemy... A: If you learn to concentrate on the present for such answers, the dividends realized will far exceed expectations. Q: Oh, John Dee supposedly had a vision of the Angel Uriel who gave him a highly polished black stone which was convex, and into which he gazed to communicate with other realms. This sounds very much like a psychomantium. Okay, these beings would appear on the surface of the stone and reveal all the secrets of the future. This was not an imaginary stone because it now resides in the British Museum. However, he late hooked up with Edward Kelly who was, apparently, a complet con-artist. What kind of beings did Dee and Kelly conjure through their polished stone? A: Fourth Density. Q: STS or STO? A: Both. Q: Was Eugenius Philalethes the nom de plume for Thomas Vaughan? A: Yes. Q: What is the 'prime matter' of the alchemical process? A: H2O. Q: What? (Ark) Water can be in different states. A: Heavy water. Q: What is heavy water? (Ark) Instead of normal hydrogen, you have hydrogen atoms with two neutrons. It is used in atomic plants. (L) Okay, if that is the prime matter, what is the philosophical mercury that goes with it? A: Wrong "track." Q: What is the right track? A: See several answers back. Q: It is not etherally correct to answer this? A: No, sound, Laura, sound! See Leed Skallen. Q: How does one produce this sound? A: We have given you the pieces, now "fit them in." Q: Well, they say that prime matter is that which is created by God and is firmly captured within you, yourself, and that any creature of God deprived of it will die. So, I have come to the idea that this prime matter is blood, which is connected to the hemoglobin molecule, which is... A: What is the human body composed of? 77 per cent... what? Q: Well, water... A: Bingo! Q: Well, how does one change the water in one's body to heavy water, and what kind of effect does that have on the system? A: See previous responses! Q: How does one make the water in the body into heavy water? A: See previous responses! Q: Is it as simple as going into a trance an humming 'ooom?' A: On the right track, but short of destination. Q: Does it have something to do with the bones... using the bones in the body as resonators? A: Just review when convenient. Guessing will derail you. Q: I need a clue about this sound... A: You have been given this. Q: Well, I thought about the DNA, marrow, blood, hemoglobin, magnetite, and the fact that blood is manufactured in the marrow of the bones, and the symbolism of the skull and crossbones which is also the symbol of the Rosie Cross, and the image of the blood of the pelican - so it just made me think that blood was important. Does blood have something to do with this internal sound or does the sound change the blood? A: No more on this.
Meanwhile, back to the forwarded message.... having to do with sound and all that... Laura *********************
Dear Karen,
I was originally going to send this to the list, but changed my mind. Don't want to cause another "storm" to erupt. But, thought you might find it entertaining and you can share it with others who you think might be interested also. Laura
On 24 May 99, at 21:48, Mythisis@aol.com wrote: > Great website Karen..thanks for sending. You are so lucky to have seen
> it. I have
seen it on TV shows but that is all. I've always found it
> to be very interesting and I wonder about the man
who built it...he
> always seemed rather mysterious.
Hi Karen,
Yes, this Coral Castle thing is very strange and I have a funny story to tell about it.
(All who object to my "insights," which I call "superluminal communication with myself in the future," and others call "channeling," stop reading right here.)
Back on 10-23-94 while I was going through all my "general mysteries of the planet" series of questions, I jumped to the subject of Stonehenge:
Q: (L) Who built Stonehenge? A: Druids. Q: (L) Who were the Druids? A: Early Aryan group. Q: (L) How did they move the stones and set them up? A: Sound wave focusing; try it yourself; Coral Castle. Q: (L) Who taught the Druids to use the sound waves? A: They knew; handed down. Q: (L) When was Stonehenge built? A: 6000 approx. B.C. Q: (L) What was Stonehenge built to do or be used for? A: Energy director. Q: (L) What was this energy to be directed to do? A: All things. Q: (L) Was the energy to be directed outward or inward to the center? A: Both. Q: (L) Are you suggesting we should get together and try to move something with sound? A: Yes. Q: (L) Does this sound come from our bodies? A: Learn. Laura will find answer through discovery.
Well, we couldn't get any more information, so we moved to another subject.
A few months later, in January, I was invited to speak to the Tampa/St.Pete/Clearwater MUFON group. It was at that meeting that I was approached by the journalist, Thomas French... AND another fellow who was an associate of Henry Belk, the fellow who has spent a fortune traveling around the world checking out and filming "psychic surgeons." This guy, (the "associate"), named Jiles Hamilton, invited me to come to Orlando and speak to his "group" the following month. I agreed.
On the drive over (two of my children accompanied me) my daughter asked me what I was going to talk about. I said that I wasn't sure, because I had no idea how "receptive" the audience would be. So, she said: "Mom, you don't have time to break it to them gently." I thought that was a wise child thing, and that is what I did. I told the group about my personal sighting which occurred at a time that I was still in the "skeptical-to-the-point-of-contemptuous of UFOs" stage and how abruptly and completely my life was changed by it and the realizations that accompanied dealing with such a phenomenon. I then told them about the endless research I had done on the subject, having become obsessed with discovering just exactly what this business was all about that I had closed my eyes to for so many years. That, of course, led to a brief synopsis of the "C's communication" and THEIR take on the subject.
Okay, fine. There was not a great deal of "receptivity." There was a gal there who claimed to be a "Pleiadian Walk-In" and who offered to "cure me" through her Pleiadian Dance Therapy... I declined. There was a Cabala teacher, assorted MUFON folks, and, of course, Henry Belk who was pretty focused on his "psychic surgery" agenda.
After my talk, we watched Henry's latest video of a gal over on the East Coast who "exudes" gold foil through the skin and who was Henry's latest object of study. It was pretty fascinating because the camera was "up close and personal" and you could SEE this stuff just "growing" out of this girl's body. She was almost completely illiterate and sort of a "Motorcycle Mama" type of person, so there was no "spiritual attribution" going on. It was curious.
Anyway, (yes, I am getting to the Coral Castle business!), after all the presentations, snacks were being served and an old fellow came up to me and said: "I want to shake your hand! What you have just done is the most courageous thing I have ever seen! I have been studying this business for about 40 years and you are the first person I have ever heard tell it like it REALLY is!"
Of course, I was appreciative of the kind words, but not being entirely sure that either my "source" or my own opinions are so right, I took it with a grain of salt. I thanked him and he started telling me that he was a retired engineer from the Air Force, having formerly been in the Army Air Corps, and was stationed in South Florida and saw a UFO in the Everglades... he claimed to have been associated with J. Allen Hynek and claimed to know Morris Jessup and a few others. Then he said that he had some stuff to show me and that I ought to pay him a personal visit sometime.
By this time, I was thinking the guy was just a little loony, so I politely eased myself into another group and just sort of stood there drinking my cola and listening to what was being said. There was a couple visiting from the north and they were asking Jiles about the "Coral Castle."
Naturally, my ears pricked up at that. I listened more carefully. Jiles told the folks: "Oh, you have to ask Hilliard about THAT! He knew the guy who built it." He pointed off to the side and I looked where he was pointing and it was my "little old man."
I became suddenly a LOT more interested in the old guy! So, I waited for my chance and cornered him and said: "I hear you knew the guy who built the Coral Castle?" "Ayup!" (he had a funny "sing-song" way of talking.)
So, he was telling me about his friendship with Edward Leedskallin and how he was the only person who was really close to the guy and what a crime it was that Leonard Nimor made such a farce of the TV special about the thing because it was pure hokey and all that.
But, he really wanted to talk about it in private and said that he had a MS that he had put toghether from his talks with Leedskallin and I ought to come to see him and have a look. It was the only copy and he was afraid to turn loose of it.
Well, my curiosity got the better of me. I made an appointment to come back to the Orlando area, which I did the following month... February.
The funny thing is, of course, that if the C's had not mentioned the key words: "Coral Castle," I would probably have had NO interest in this guy at ALL! But, because they had offered it as a clue to a "discovery," I was "primed" and ready to follow the "trail."
So, (hope this is not getting boring), I made the trip back over (it is about 100 miles from my home) and visited Hilliard (that's the guy's name.)
When I walked in his house, a beautiful lakeshore Frank Lloyd Wright type affair, I was AMAZED at all the UFO stuff all over the place. HUGE blown up photos... shelves FULL of books and videos and "reports"... knick-knacks... you name it. He pulled out a big box of typewritten sheets and we began to talk about Edward Leedskallin.
Story is that EL was fond of telling folks that "he knew the secret of how the pyramids were built." Also, apparently, the Coral Castle was built in one place and then, because of zoning or some such reason, had to be MOVED... and the guy did it in ONE NIGHT! There never was any such thing as "lost love" called "Sweet Sixteen" that was told on the TV special - Leedskallin made that up just to bamboozle the media and laughed about it ever after.
Hilliard pointed out that the most amazing thing about the building was that the quarry where the stones came from HAD NO TAILINGS --- that is, there was no piles of "stonedust" from cutting.
Hilliard hinted that he knew the "secret," but he was not yet ready to tell me... but he gave me a hint. He said: "You know, I am the only one who was ever inside Edward's private room. He was very ascetic, and lived in only one room with the barest necessities. In his room were only four objects: a cot bed, a table and chair that he made himself, and an airplace seat suspended from the ceiling by chains."
He looked at me VERY intently as he said this and I realized that this was the clue.
An "airplane seat?" I asked.
"Ayup."
Well, that was all he would say at that point. He showed me photos of him and Leedskallin (he was in his AF uniform) and there were photos of Leedskallin and his children and group photos and all that. But, he wouldn't let me take the MS, even though I offered to retype it on computer and put it on a diskette. He said he would have to "think about it."
The very next day, Hilliard was in an auto accident... fortunately, he was not seriously injured.
Well, on 03-11-95, I brought the subject up with the C's again:
Q: (L) I want to ask about the fellow with the Coral Castle. We went over to see Hillard, as you know. He had an accident after we saw him, the very next day, in fact. When we were talking to Hillard, he told us about the man who built the Coral Castle. This fellow had, apparently, in his private quarters, four objects: a bed, a table and chair, and a swing made of an airplane seat suspended from the ceiling by a chain, complete with seatbelts. Is this... A: You got it right because you are learning and rebundling DNA as a result of this and other activities.
Well, the idea I had that the C's did not wait for me to express, was that this swing was ESSENTIAL to the process for some reason... that either he used it to induce an altered state by swinging, or that he did this by "spinning." My preference as an idea was "spinning."
On 04-22-95, I brought up the subject again:
Q: (L) Did the guy who built the Coral Castle sit in his airplane seat suspended from the ceiling and spin in it? Was the airplane seat suspended from the ceiling in his room part of how he did his work? A: If you spin, it must be a precise method, not just spinning randomly. Q: (L) Did he discover a precise method for spinning to do such things? A: Open. Q: (T) So many turns and precise direction? (L) Can we follow up on this? Is there something on this moving things with sound that you can tell us? (J) What about a precise method for spinning? A: Suggest experimentation.
Well, a LOT of stuff happened for awhile, including my divorce, and I did not come back to the subject until 1996... In the May of 1995, we had a guest at one of our sessions who was a physicist and he was pretty excited about the answers he was getting... and I had the feeling that there were some sort of "ramifications" to this meeting, but there was so much "personal" stuff going on I did not have time to really think about it. But, it started a "trend" of asking physics questions which popped up now and again.
In the early months of 1996 I had delved into the works of Ibn Al-Arabi, the great Sufi Shaykh, and was pretty startled to discover that much of these works were incredibly similar to things the C's would say... so, I was asking about the Sufi teachings one night... struggling with my post-divorce depression... and the C's popped up with the following, sort of "out of the blue":
06-15-96,
A: Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear. Q: (L) Can we free associate about these gravity waves since no bookstores are open at this hour? Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct? A: And.... Q: (L) And hmmmm.... A: And antimatter! Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter "antigravity?" Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak? A: Binder. Q: (L) Okay. Gravity is the binder. Is gravity the binder of matter? A: And... Q: (L) Is gravity a property of light? A: Not the issue. Q: (L) What is the issue? Can you help me out here? A: Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!! Q: (L) Is antimatter ethereal existence? A: Pathway to. Q: (L) Okay. A: Doorway to. Q: (L) Are unstable gravity waves... no, hold everything... do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density? A: Throughout. Q: (L) Do they emanate from any particular density? A: That is just the point, there is none. Q: (L) There are no unstable gravity waves? A: Wrong... Q: (L) There is no emanation point? A: Yes. Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation? A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti-matter, too! Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities? A: Everything. Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically? A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing. Q: (L) Okay, what kind of a device would collect and disperse gravity waves? Is this what spirals do? A: On the way to. Q: (L) So, if were to focus on collecting unstable gravity waves... A: When you wrote "Noah" where did you place gravity? Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow of electrical energy... A: Gravity is no byproduct! It is the central ingredient of all existence! Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption... and I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness, and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life... A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And where does it go? Q: (L) The windows? A: The gravity. Q: (L) Oh. Gravity must go into the ethereal dimensions or densities. I mean, you have my head going in so many different directions that I feel like I have popcorn in there. A: Good! Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go. The sun is a window. Even our planet must be a window! A: You have it too!! Q: (L) So, gravity is the unifying principle... the thing that keeps things together, like the way all the fat pulls together in a bowl of soup. A: Gravity is all there is. Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity? A: No. Q: (L) What is light? A: Gravity. Q: (L) Is gravity the same as the strong and weak nuclear forces? A: Gravity is "God." Q: (L) But, I thought God was light? A: If gravity is everything, what isn't it? Light is energy expression generated by gravity. Q: (L) Is gravity the "light that cannot be seen," as the Sufis call it: the Source. A: Please name something that is not gravity. Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is not gravity. Fine. What is absolute nothingness? A: A mere thought. Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non-existence? A: Yes, there is. Q: (L) Do thoughts produce gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Does sound produce gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can sound manipulate gravity? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can it be done with the human voice? A: Yes. Q: (L) Can it be done tonally or by power through thought? A: Both. Q: (L) Then, is there also specific sound configurations involved? A: Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity. Q: (L) Now, did the fellow who built the Coral Castle spin in his airplane seat while thinking his manipulations into place? A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order to manipulate gravity. Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness? A: Yes. Q: (L) Is it ever possible for the individual to do the choosing, or is it gravity that IS him that chose? A: The gravity that was inside him was all the gravity in existence. Q: (L) Well, I thought the Sufis were tough! (F) Well, it's probably because of your studies that this door opened. (L) Good grief! What have I done! Alright. I am confused. A: No you are not. Q: (L) Then, just put it this way: I am befuddled and overloaded. A: Befuddling is fun! Q: (L) Well, I guess that if any of this is going to be of particular significance to us, then we will certainly find out the details as we go along. A: How many times do we have to tell you?!?! Q: (L) Learning is fun! Right! A: The entire sum total of all existence exists within each of you, and vice versa. Q: (L) Then what is the explanation for the "manyness" that we perceive? A: Perception of 3rd density. Q: (L) So, the entire universe is inside me... okay, that's... I understand. Oddly enough, I do. The problem is accessing it, stripping away the veils. A: That is the fun part. Q: (L) So, the fellow who built the Coral Castle was able to access this. Consistently or only intermittantly? A: Partially. Q: (L) According to what I understand, at the speed of light, there is no mass, no time, and no gravity. How can this be? A: No mass, no time, but yes, gravity. Q: (L) A photon has gravity? A: Gravity supercedes light speed. Q: (L) Gravity waves are faster than light? A: Yes. Q: (L) What would make a gravity wave unstable? A: Utilization. Q: (L) I feel like I am missing a really big point here... A: You are, but you can only find it at your own pace. Q: (L) Well, I think I need to do some reading and research so that I can come back to this. A: And, on that note, good night.
As it so happened, at almost the precise moment the C's brought up this "gravity" business, Ark was sitting on a megalith (I have a photo of the very stone on the wall to my left) that was on its side, in Florence, writing in his research journal about "gravity waves" because he had decided that this was a key to some things he was working on. At almost the same moment, we decided, on opposite sides of the globe, unbeknownst to each other, to "research" gravity waves.
So, the next day I started doing a websearch. What I found was abysmally sparse. Seems that either noboyd knew anything, or they just weren't saying. I was getting pretty desperate after a couple of weeks of dead ends, so I pulled up all the references from the C's remarks and pasted them together. I then posted an article to the Skywatch mail list about it, hoping that it would stimulate some discussion and leads that I could follow.
On 06-22-96, the following remarks were made that just added to the mystery:
Q: (V) Righteous! (L) Terry showed me a couple of accupuncture points that seem to induce an altered state. Is this, as he says, a way to open the door to the subconscious? A: Stimulates endorphins. Q: (L) Is there any point on the body that CAN be used to assist in opening the gate to the subconscious? A: No such assistance is needed. First, we would like to suggest that you seek a "spin" doctor for your quest!! Q: (L) Would a "spin" doctor be a Sufi master? A: One example. Q: (L) Yes. We are supposed to do several things involved with spinning. A: Hilliard. Leedskallen. Coral Castle. Q: (L) Well, they are really pushing on this gravity thing. Can I ask a question on another subject? A: You can ask about the Easter Bunny, if you wish.
I went away on July 3rd to my aunt's for the 4th of July... and became so restless there that I decided to drive home right after the fireworks on the 4th instead of waiting for the next day. I just felt like I HAD to get home! So, we drove most of the night and pulled in after 1 a.m.
Before I went to bed, I checked my e-mail... there was a funny little note from a guy named "ark" asking for the references to my "gravity waves" article...
But, THAT'S a different story. (But, as it turns out, he WAS a "spin doctor!")
Well, when Ark came to America, we planned to visit Hilliard and get down to business about this Coral Castle thing... and I called to tell Hilliard we would be coming over (we had visited back and forth several times by this point, and talked on the phone frequently. He was anxious to meet Ark and talk to him.) Anyway, I called and a stranger answered Hilliard's phone. Turned out that it was his neighbor and that, at that VERY MOMENT Hilliard was being taken away in an ambulance... he had had a stroke.
And he died a few hours later.
And that's the story.
Laura
From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net> To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net> Subject: "Dwellings" and De Lubicz Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net Date sent: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:11:19 -0400
Dwellings arrived on Monday and I am about 1/3 of the way through. I find that I have to stop and breathe from time to time. Definitely think this is the book C's were talking about in their remarks about "Prime Numbers are the Dwellings of the Mystics." It constantly brings up things C's said - one of the most interesting being about "virgin's milk," which was so obscure to me at the time, but makes perfect sense now. And, as I am reading, I think I am able to put together the operation more "securely" as a result of clues from "other sources" which prepared me for reading this.
Also just ordered a whole slew of Schwaller de Lubicz books. Am surprised that I missed this one. But, one can't go in ALL directions at once, even if I do sometimes try.
I found "mystery of the cathedrals" in UK and it ought to arrive pretty soon. Have just about blown the book budget for the month. Gave up on Brotherhood of Light coming through on that one.
Decided to unsubscribe from the "ancient wisdom" list. Don't think there is too much interest in ancient wisdom among the members... and I don't do small talk well. Don't like the "attack mode" they go into when anyone brings up anything of any significance or seriousness, either.
Another book that you might find interesting is "Synchronicity: The Bridge Between Matter and Mind" by F. David Peat. Gives some pretty interesting physics connections to the idea of being able to "create universes" and PK abilities and so forth.
Seems that Jung had a lot of the same kinds of experiences I had with the PK and synchronicities. From what you have said, same with you folks. The most interesting was the description of the shattering of glass and loud cracking noises and things falling and all that. It drove me nuts while it was happening with such regularity, and I wondered why it suddenly stopped happening, (except for occasional bursts) and this book goes into it in some detail. Jung described the sensation just prior to such events as a "burning in the solar plexus." Well, I don't think I was ever aware enough to be able to identify such. It was always such a surprise to me and I was always focused "outward' at something or other, so that I did not have the presence of mind to analyze what I was physically experiencing.
By the way, have you read Jessie Weston's "From Ritual to Romance?" Her discussion of the "ritual sword dance" sort of reminded me of what the C's said about how Stonehenge was used...
Well, back to my books and notes.
Laura
From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net> To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net> Subject: Canaries, Grails, and Ladies with Candles...??? Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net Date sent: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:25:29 -0400
This
"Canary" business has been a big issue here because
the C's brought it
up once and kept urging that I study the
history of these
islands for BIG clues as to "who's on
first," so to
speak.
Well, I couldn't
find anything other than travelogues in
the library and
about the same on the web, and I was
getting pretty
frustrated.
Then Ark had to be
in Germany for several months two
summers ago at his
affiliated uni and he was poking around
in the library there
for me. He found a funny little
book
in English,
published by the Hakluyt Society, about the
history of the
Canary Islands and its people, written by
"The Friar
Alonso De Espinosa of The Order of Preachers" in
1594 and he
photocopied the whole thing for me and mailed
it.
Well, this book
REALLY raised the hair on my head when you
think of some of the
funny "word connections." For
example: Tenerife
-> Teniers -> Tenebris (darkness, as in
"Lux et
Tenebris") -> tenier (meaning "hand" and the
repeated images of
"hands" in alchemical literature as well
as the "red
hand" of Owen Llawgoch); not to mention the
connection of the
word "Canary" to "Canaris" or Sirius ->
Isis -> and THEN, as if that isn't enough, the Order
of
Preachers was an
Augustinian offshoot; Augustine replaced
St. Anthony on
January 17th; the purported "Roswell UFO
crash" actually
happened on the "Plains of San Augustin";
think about the word
"Roswell" and "RosTau"; on the Island
of Tenerife there is
a Socorro and a Santa Cruz... near
Roswell there is a
Socorro and the relation of Socorro to
Saqqara...
Then, near Roswell
there is also Magdalena, and the
Magdalene issue of
Rennes-le-Chateau and Socorro is derived
from
"Succor" and that word is used in the RLC business in
relation to
Magdalene...
THEN there is the
discovery of the mysterious statue of
"Our Lady of
Candelaria" on the beach of the Canaries at
the exact time that
de Troyes is writing his Grail Opus...
Well, if that isn't
enough, there is what this funny friar
recorded about the
Canaries:
"Among the
seven islands commonly called the Canaries, the
largest [...] is
Tenerife. The ancients gave it the
name
of Nivaria, froma a
lofty mountain in its centre called
Teyde (translated:
Mt. Ida!!!)
"Tenerife is in
28 degrees 30 minutes North latitude (one
degree away from the
Great Pyramid approx and just a few
minutes away from
yours truly) [...} It is generally
believed that this
island is the "Elysian Fields" of which
Homer sings (i.e.
Arcadia)
"[...] There is
another special thing connected with the
island. It is that no poisonous animal whatever is
bred in
it, such as snakes,
lizards, scorpions, but only certain
SPIDERS which do
harm when they bite.
"In former
times this island was inhabited by the natives
of it, whom we call
Guanches.
"It has not
been possible to ascertain their origin or
whence they caame,
for as the natives had no letters, they
had no account of
their origin or descent, although some
tradion may have
come down from father to son. There
have
been many opinions
on the subject. Some say they are
descended from the
Romans, although it does not appear
whence they came,
nor on what authority the opinion is
founded. Others say that they are descended from
certain
tribes in Africa...
"The Guanches
themselves say that they have an immemorial
tradition that sixty
people came to this island but they
know not whence they
came. They united and fformed
their
settlement near
Icod, which is a place on this island, and
they gave it this
name, which is a word in their language:
Alzanxiquian
abacanabac xerax, which means "The place of
union of the son of
the great one."
"This people
had very good and perfect features, and well-
shaped bodies. They were of tall stature, with
proportionate
limbs. There were GIANTS among them
of
incredible size; and
that it may not appear fabulous, I
will not repeat what
is said on the subject." (DRAT!)
"They ate the flesh
of sheep, goats, and pigs, and they fed
on it by itself,
without any other relish whatever, and
without gofio (a
grain: early food combining?) The
flesh
had to be half
roasted because, as they said, it contained
more 'substance' in
that way than if it was well roasted.
(Standard Celtic
practice)
"It is
wonderful that men so valiant and with such
strengthe and
agility, and with such fine faculties as they
possessed, should
have been brought up on such rough and
coarse food.
"They were
wonderfully clever in counting. Although a
flock was very
numerous and came out of the yard or fold at
a rush, they counted
the sheep without opening their mouths
or noting with their
hands, and never made a mistake.
Regarding the
"miraculous appearance of the Virgin of
Candelaria"
(remember the woman in the grail stories
carrying the
candles)
"In this island
and among the people I have described, God
was served that one
of the greatest relics in the world,
and the one that has
worked most miracles, should appear
many years BEFORE
the light of faith or the news of the
evangel reached
them. Though the ancients called
this
island and its
neighbours the 'Fortunate Isles," for the
fertility of the
soil and the fine climate, as well as for
the docility of its
people, and the abundance of men of
genius it has
produced, there is no stronger reason for
giving it this title
of fortunate than that they possess a
gift so
supernatural, a favour so unusual, a benefit so
immense, a peice of
good fortune so great, as the most holy
image of Candelaria
which appeared on the island.
"It would be
very difficult to fix the time when this holy
image appeared; for
as it has come down from one to
another, the
memorial was gradually lost. Nevertheless,
taking advantage of
their ancient pictures that refer to it
and serve as
writing, and of the computation by moons which
the former
inhabitants used
"The year 1400
of our redemption was 105 years BEFORE the
island belonged to
Christians and there was no knowledge of
the evangel. (This is the friar's approximation, though
he
admits that it is
really only guesswork) Our Lord
was
served that this
should be the time when the holy image of
Candelaria appeared
to begin the enlightenment of this
fortunate people.
"It appeared in
a very dry desert place, near the sea-
shore, and close to
a sandy beach a league in length at the
mouth of a
ravine. It was ON a stone where, as a
memorial
of its appearance,
the Christians afterwards set up a
cross, which is now
standing.
To make a long story
short, this statue just appeared on
the beach one day
and was found by two shepherds. The
sheep were
frightened and turned back and the shepherds
went to check out
what was frightening them. They saw
this
statue, standing
upright, on a large rock. One of
the
shepherds was going
to throw a stone at it after they
figured out it
wasn't real and was not going to speak, and
his arm was frozen
in the upright posture... the first
miracle of the
statue was the healing of his arm.
So, we skip over the
details of the finding and then
carrying the statue
to a cave to give it a holy
environment, because
they decided it was the image of a
goddess.
The friar then goes
on to relate the story of the Ark of
the Covenant and how
it had "powers" and that the powers of
this statue turned
out to be pretty similar and he gives
some examples.
He then says:
"It is
excusable to wish to investigate the origin of this
holy relic, and
whence it came to this island; for all
concerning it should
be a subject of enquiry. In the
year
which the image
appeared, although the navigation of this
sea was known, and
there was information respecting these
islands, yet the sea
was not then navigated freely, nor did
it lead anywhere
until Cape Verd was discovered and the
route to the
Indies. Therefore, to say that some
ship of
Christians brought
it, and when they brought it that they
left it to be dashed
about among rocks and stones, is not
credible. For the image is the most beautiful and the
best
finished piece of
work that can be seen. (there is an
illustration of the
statue which is covered with letters
that have never been
decoded.)
So, he goes on with
his story until he gets to this most
INTERESTING
remark:
"For more than
thirty or forty years the holy relic was in
possession of the
infidels. For the people only knew
and
believed that it was
something supernatural. They were
certified of this,
because they heard much angelic music,
smelt delicious
odours, and saw MANY LIGHTS AT NIGHT. All
these things
confirmed them in their opinion.
"[...] While
the holy image of Candelaria was at Chinguaro
in the house of the
Lord of Buimar, or in the small cave
near it, where it
remaine for many years, the native
Guanches often heard
celestial sounds and saw many burning
lights in form of a
procession. They were not so
frequent
at first as they
became when the holy image was removed to
the cave of San
Blas.
"The
processions formed by the angels, as well on the beach
where the holy image
was, as on that of SOCORRO where she
first appeared,
became very frequent, both by night and
day, with solemnity
and harmony, music from softest voices,
a great company in
perfect order with lighted candles. So
they made their
processions from the hermitage they now
call Santiago to the
cave of San Blas, there being a wide
beach all the
way. These processions were so frequent
that
the natives ceased
to be surprised.
"On the beach
they call Aboan, which is some four leagues
from that of
Candelaria towards the Punta Roja, these
processions were
also seen, generally on the eve of the
Assumption of our
Lady. This is so perfectly true, that
now, in these times,
persons who have seen it go to the
beach and find
candles with the wax burnt out,. They
have
even found some
lighted and fixed to rocks. They
pointed
out the place to me,
and I saw them. I speak of what I
have seen and heard,
and keep the wax in my power. I
have
heard the same from
many others. The candles they find
on
these beaches are
not very white, and it is not known
of
what the wicks
consist. They are not cotton nor tow,
but
look more like
twisted white silk.
"There appeared
also on this island, twenty years before it
was conquered, a
great quantiy of whit wax in loaves, in an
adjacent port, which
for this reason was called the Port of
Wax. [...] The witness said that it was public and
notorious in this
island that a miracle is worked each
year, a certain
quantity of dry wax in loaves appearing for
the last twenty
years in a certain place in this island.
This wax always
appeared four of five days before the feast
of Candelaria, which
is the Purification, that these might
be the means of
making candles for the celebration."
From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net> To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net> Subject: Myths Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net Date sent: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:33:08 -0400
Just a
few copies shipped in case they might be useful. Am cleaning out the AW folder and deleting.
Laura
On 7 Apr 99, at
10:31, Tokapu@aol.com wrote:
>
> Not meaning
to be disagreeable to the rest of your most fascinating post
> about the
nature of mythology, but I have to jump in here. I think
> Herodotus
(who is referred to in the above quote) has done more harm to
> the history
of Egypt than anyone except Napoleon. Herodotus was a very
> bad writer.
THAT is why he would make such a statement. He was groping
> for imagery,
and it is obvious that he was totally overwhelmed and
> undone by
what he found in Egypt. He just couldn’t think of anything to
> say about
the NEXT miracle of art and architecture he found himself
> confronted
by. I have always felt sad for the Egyptians given the sorry
> assignment
of showing this Greek "historian" around, trying to explain
> to this
barbarian what "civilization" means. Tokapu ;-)
I know that
Herodotus has been trashed to a great extent,
but we don't have a
whole heck of a lot to work with and we
have to read between
the lines and compare.
Strabo also wrote
about the Egyptian Labyrinth:
"We have here
also in the labyrinth, a work equal to the
pyramids, and
adjoining to it the tomb of the king who
constructed the
labyrinth [...] The surprising circumstance
is that the roofs of
these [aulae} consist of a single
stone each, and that
the covered ways through their whole
range were roofed in
the same manner with single slabs of
stone of
extraordiary size, without the intermixture of
timber or of any
other material. [...] The aulae may
be
seen in a line
supported by twenty-seven pillars, each
consisting of a
single stone... "
Strabo was writing
at about the beginning of the Christian
era and found many
of the structures in a tumble-down
condition (as
opposed to Herodotus who claims to have been
given a tour of the
facility.)
Pliny the Elder wrote of the Egyptian and Cretan
labyrinths.
So, if Strabo says
it was "equal" to the pyramids, and
Herodotus says it
surpassed... well, we STILL have an
incredible structure
that no longer exists. I
understand
that somebody or
other claims to have found the ruins of it
in the latter part
of the last century and that it was all
scattered and
buried.
The funny thing that
struck me at one point (among many, of
course) was the fact
that the Egyptian Labyrinth was at
"Lake
Moeris." In the Pyramid Texts
(Faulkner) there are
repeated remarks
that are translated as "Beware of the
Lake."
Then, there is this
guy in Wisconsin who has found this
"sunken
city" which is being interpreted preliminarily as a
ceremonial center
that was built IN a lake, but only when
the lake level was
different - about 3,500 BC... and there
are some remarks in
there about the local Native American
lore that these guys
"walked on water." Joseph
interprets
this to mean that
there were stones placed just beneath the
water and the
"path" was only revealed to the initiates and
they would have
their ceremonies at night, carrying
torches,
"walking on water!"
From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net> To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net> Subject: Stones and Anti-gravity Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net Date sent: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:37:06 -0400
Fellow behind me
died a few months ago and his kids were
having an estate
sale. They ended up giving me about
10
cartons of books just
to get rid of them. In there was a
book by Morris K.
Jessup... and it is quite an amazing bit
of work. It is very old and yellow and falling
apart. I
looked on the web to
see if I could get a new copy, and the
only one I found was
a used one for 100 bucks - because it
is considered a
"rare book."
So, I am scanning it
and converting it to text because it
is clear it will not
tolerate much handling. He talks
about the Vimanas
and a LOT of other really amazing stuff.
Story is, he was
working on another book when he was
murdered and it was
arranged to look like a suicide.
He talks about (and
remember, this was the early 50's) anti-
gravity as the
"propulsion system" for these ancient craft
as well as the
"building" system for the megalithic
structures.
He remarks:
"It is not
iwthin the scope of this book to show that a
civilization of
single origin covered this planet some tens
of thousnads of
years ago - perhaps hundreds of thousands.
Such a case can be
made, without too much difficulty, in
spite of the
anti-Atlanteans who have a phobia against it;
and we can show that
there have been two - at least two -
principle waves of
civilization. The first can be
said
roughly, to be
antediluvian and the second postdiluvian,
speaking in general
terms...
[...]
"All of the
centers of civilization and cultural
renaissance
recognized by present-day anthropologists -
India, Peru,
Yucatan, Egypt, Babylonia, Greece, China,
Rome, England, and
others - are but the reviving remnants
of an empire and
civilization which colonized the world a
hundred thousand
years ago. They are all parts, or
nuclei,
in one great
renaissance which has been taking place for,
roughly, six to ten
thousand years. In it are some traces
of the archaic,
original, master culture, and, perhaps
through India,
Tibet, Egypt and Middle America, there are
some tenuous links
between our immature revival and the
parent past. Thse traces are mostly in the form of
stone
works, and some
glyphs of a singular nature, with a very
few written records
existing mostly in the Orient, and
particularly in
southern Asia.
"All of this is
anathema to conventional science,
archaeology and
anthropology especially, since organized
science has set up a
pattern which covers human growth in
broad general terms,
and has accepted some rigidly
restricting tenets
which limit original thinking and shut
out much that is
obvious. While these general
assumptions
of science are
largely proven by observation and
deduction, they are
only proven up to a point. Beyond
that
point there are the
'erratics': little annoying things,
events, or
artifacts, which stubbornly refuse to fit into
the pattern, and
which are sturdily disregarded in the
interest of
maintaining a working hypothesis acceptable to
science in its
current state of thinking.
"In addition to
all this there is the refusal to
acknowledge evidence
antedating the current subwave which
extends back only
about 3 to 8 thousand years, and that far
only in Egypt and
South Asia. All data in conflict
with
this basic
assumption are rejected by definition.
"Many of the
erratics cease to be erratics by the simple
expedient of
admitting the real antiquity of human culture
upon the earth. Most of the perpetual squabble over
whether Asians
settled America, or Americans colonize Asia,
are painlessly
dissolved by merely extending the time scale
back a few thousnad
years - and perhaps accepting a new
working theory to
the effect that all present cultures are
traceable to a
common origin.
"Aside from
written records, to be discussed later, which
establish mechanical
flight at a remote time of maybe
70,000 to 200,000
years ago, we concern ourselves at the
moment only with the
gigantic stone masonry which remains
in almost all parts
of the world. Certain
characteristics
of some of the stone
work bespeak origin in a single,
widespread
civilization, highly developed in some ways, but
NOT MECHANICAL IN
THE SAME SENSE AS OURS OF TODAY.
[...]
"It can
confidently be said that the First Civilization had
simple and effective
methods of working and moving stone
which are unused
today, and which were more effective than
anything which we of
the Second Civilization have
developed.
"In many areas
we find evidence of stone blocks of
unbelievable weight
being quarried, more or less casually
moved considerable
distances, then lifted into place. This
common factor
connects pre-Inca Peru with Easter Island in
a startling and
undeniable way, and seems to tie in the
Middle East, the
Orient, Africa, and maybe Polynesia. Many
investigators and
thinkers have proposed methods for moving
these quarried and
dressed blocks. All of the
proposals
are based on
application of such simple present-day
engineering
equipment as block-and-tackle or sand ramps.
[...] No suggestions
have been made which really fit all
cases, and some of
the submissions are so cumbersome and
inadequate as to
seem ridiculous.
"One such
example is the Sacsahuaman Fortress, in the High
Andes of Peru...
[...] The Fortress (so-called by
archaeologists, who
admit no types of building other than
religious, military,
and occasionally residential) is on a
mountain-top overlooking
Cuzco. It is note-worthy as one
of the earliest
works showing the construction of walls by
grinding and fitting
stones IN SITU. These walls are
also
noted for the very
large stones which make up the lower of
three tiers, and it
is these in which we are more
interested.
"The stones
making up the corners of the reentrant angles
of this lower tier
appear to be a dark basalt; heavy hard,
and rugged. They are so large that they dwarf a man
on
horseback standing
beside them. Some of them are
about
twelve feet square
at the base, and eighteen to twenty feet
high. They are estimated to weigh about two
hundred tons
each. [..] ALL of them were rough quarried, and were then
GROUND INTO THEIR
DESIGNATED NICHES IN THE STRUCTURE BY
PUSHING THEM BACK
AND FORTH, IN SITU, until they fitted so
closely, completely
and accurately that a knife blade
cannot be inserted
between them. This is a logical
and
practical shortcut
to effective stone fitting which we have
not equaled in modern
engineering.
'(It is interesting
to note in passing, however, that we
use this method in
what is probably our operation of
highest accuracy and
precision: lens and mirror grinding
for astronomical
telescopes. No substitute has been
found
for this system of
grinding pieces of glass together to
obtain perfect
curvature, and there is no basic difference
in the two
operations.)
"The stones had
to be picked up, put approximately into
place, and pushed
back and forth until they ground
themselves into
their individually fitting contours. This
was no mean
chore. It is inferred that a means of
handling
these stones must
have existed which made it EASY to swing
these stone up and
around, and to shove them to and fro,
against terrific
friction, while pinched between their
adjacent
neighbors. Such power would tax any
modern
machine or power
plant and require an installation of
generating equipment
sufficient to run a city. It seems
plainly obvious that
some other source of power existed.
"IT MAY BE THAT
THIS TREMENDOUS POWER WAS LIMITED IN ITS
APPLICATIO TO
ARTICLES OF STONE TEXTURE ONLY, OR TO NON-
MAGNETIC MATERIALS
IN GENERAL. Such a limitation
would
have sidetracked the
development of a mechanized culture
such as ours of this
day, and would partly account for the
strange fact that
almost all relics of the profound past
are NON
METALLIC. This writer cannot see his
way to
believing that such
a power was electrical, magnetic,
calorific, or
strictly mechanical, else it would have led
to industrial
developments leaving at least a few traces."
This last paragraph
was the one I found most interesting
because, as I
remarked before, there was the injunction to
the Jews to use no
metal in the building of Solomon's
Temple, and there is
a whole slew of Celtic folklore that
tells about the
"allergy" of these "other-dimensional"
beings to anything
made of metal, particularly iron.
So, iron is an issue
here... and then we think of all the
ochre mines of
antiquity... and the ochre found in
ceremonial and grave
sites of the stone age and before.
I think that this
ochre is a clue to the means of this
motive force that
moved huge stones around like feathers...
Unless, of course,
we are to think of a mode of
construction that
involved de-molecularization and re-
molecularization in
situ. But, that doesn't serve
because
of stones left
unmoved in quarry sites... and in most
cases, as I
understand it, though it is not generally
mentioned, there are
NO TAILINGS at these quarry sites.
Anyway, when I
finish scanning this book, which is LOADED
with interesting
data the guy dug out of the Library of
Congress, I will put
it on my website so anybody can
download it.
Laura
From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net> To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net> Subject: Dances Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net Date sent: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:40:53 -0400
Let me quote from
Jessie Weston's "From Ritual to Romance":
"...it is now
generally admitted that the so-called Sword Dances, with the closely related
Morris Dances, and Mumming Plays, are not
mere survivals of martial exercises,
an inherited tradition from our warrior
ancestors, but were solemn ceremonial
(in some cases there is reason to believe, Initiatory) dances,
performed at stated seasons of the
year, and directly and intimately connected with the ritual of
which we have treated in previous chapters... And here again, our enquiry must begin with the very earliset records of our race, with the traditions of our Aryan forefathers. [...] The
earliest recorded Sword Dancers
are undoubtedly the Maruts, those
swift-footed youths in gleaming armous who are the faithful
attendants on the great god,
Indra. Professor von Schroeder, in
'Mysterium und Mimus,' describes them
thus: they are a group of youths of equal age and IDENTICAL PARENTAGE,
(emphasis, mine), they are alwasy
depicted as attired in the same manner... (this description is in German,
so forgive me for omitting it just
now.) [...] Constantly throughout the Rig Veda the Maruts are referred to as Dancers, 'gold
bedecked with songs of praise they danced round the spring. When ye Maruts spear- armed dance, the Heavesn stream together like waves of water.' The Maruts, as said
above, were conceived of as the companions
of Indra, and helpers in his fight against his monstrous
adversaries."
Thus, they are sort
of like Arthur's Knights, or the "thousand sleeping warriors" in the cave with Owen waiting for the "end time" to be awakened.
But, back to Weston:
"When we turn from the early Aryan to the classic Greek period, we
find in the Kouretes, and in a minor
degree in the Korybantes, a parallel
so extraordinarily complete, alike in
action and significance, that an essential identity of origin appears to
be beyond doubt. [...] The Kouretes were, as their name
indicates, a band of armed youths, of
semi-divine origin. ... The home of the Kouretes was in Crete, where they were closely associated with the worship of the Goddess
Rhea. [...] There dance was by some
writers identified with the Pyrrhic dance, first performed by Athene, in honour of her victory over the
Giants. [...] a fragmentary 'Hymn of
the Kouretes,' discovered among the
ruins of a temple in Crete, a text
which places beyond all doubt the fact
that, however mythical in origin,
the Kouretes, certainly had actual human representatives, and that while in the case of the Maruts there may be a question as to whether their dance actually took place, or not, so far as the Kouretes are concerned there can be no such doubt." (There follows
the text of the translation). "The importance of movement, notably of what we may call group movement, as a stimulant to natural energies, is thoroughly recognized among primitive peoples; with them Dance holds a position equivalent to that which, in more advanced
communities, is assigned to Prayer."
And it goes on in some
detail.
And then, one thinks of David "dancing before the Ark of the Lord." That has always made me wonder...
See also: Vincent Bridges Tells His Own Story Vincent Bridges AKA "Dr. Strange" Vincent Bridges AKA "Dr. Strange" Is Truth Defamatory?The COINTELPRO Files: Vincent Bridges and Co. (photographic exhibit) The Bridges - Jadczyk Correspondence The Weidner - Jadczyk Correspondence
You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]